Similar articles

Abstract: Large bone defects in load-bearing bone can result from tumor resection, osteomyelitis, trauma, and other factors. Although bone has the intrinsic potential to self-repair and regenerate, the repair of large bone defects which exceed a certain critical size remains a substantial clinical challenge. Traditionally, repair methods involve using autologous or allogeneic bone tissue to replace the lost bone tissue at defect sites, and autogenous bone grafting remains the “gold standard” treatment. However, the application of traditional bone grafts is limited by drawbacks such as the quantity of extractable bone, donor-site morbidities, and the risk of rejection. In recent years, the clinical demand for alternatives to traditional bone grafts has promoted the development of novel bone-grafting substitutes. In addition to osteoconductivity and osteoinductivity, optimal mechanical properties have recently been the focus of efforts to improve the treatment success of novel bone-grafting alternatives in load-bearing bone defects, but most biomaterial synthetic scaffolds cannot provide sufficient mechanical strength. A fundamental challenge is to find an appropriate balance between mechanical and tissue-regeneration requirements. In this review, the use of traditional bone grafts in load-bearing bone defects, as well as their advantages and disadvantages, is summarized and reviewed. Furthermore, we highlight recent development strategies for novel bone grafts appropriate for load-bearing bone defects based on substance, structural, and functional bionics to provide ideas and directions for future research.

承重骨大段骨缺损的治疗：传统与新型骨移植材料

[1]AdachiT, OsakoY, TanakaM, et al., 2006. Framework for optimal design of porous scaffold microstructure by computational simulation of bone regeneration. Biomaterials, 27(21):3964-3972.

[2]AlmasiD, IqbalN, SadeghiM, et al., 2016. Preparation methods for improving PEEK’s bioactivity for orthopedic and dental application: a review. Int J Biomater, 2016:8202653.

[3]AnSH, MatsumotoT, MiyajimaH, et al., 2012. Porous zirconia/hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone reconstruction. Dent Mater, 28(12):1221-1231.

[4]AnsariMAA, GolebiowskaAA, DashM, et al., 2022. Engineering biomaterials to 3D-print scaffolds for bone regeneration: practical and theoretical consideration. Biomater Sci, 10(11):2789-2816.

[5]AntebiB, ChengXG, HarrisJN, et al., 2013. Biomimetic collagen-hydroxyapatite composite fabricated via a novel perfusion-flow mineralization technique. Tissue Eng Part C Methods, 19(7):487-496.

[6]AttiasN, LindseyRW, 2006. CASE REPORTS: management of large segmental tibial defects using a cylindrical mesh cage. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 450:259-266.

[7]AyvazM, BekmezS, YucekulA, et al., 2018. Titanium mesh cage as an alternative reconstruction method for epiphyseal-sparing tumour resections in children. J Pediatr Orthop B, 27(4):350-355.

[8]AzadaniMN, ZahediA, BowotoOK, et al., 2022. A review of current challenges and prospects of magnesium and its alloy for bone implant applications. Prog Biomater, 11(1):1-26.

[9]BachAD, KoppJ, StarkGB, et al., 2004. The versatility of the free osteocutaneous fibula flap in the reconstruction of extremities after sarcoma resection. World J Surg Oncol, 2:22.

[10]BaiF, WangZ, LuJX, et al., 2010. The correlation between the internal structure and vascularization of controllable porous bioceramic materials in vivo: a quantitative study. Tissue Eng Part A, 16(12):3791-3803.

[11]BashkuevM, ChecaS, PostigoS, et al., 2015. Computational analyses of different intervertebral cages for lumbar spinal fusion. J Biomech, 48(12):3274-3282.

[12]BauerTW, MuschlerGF, 2000. Bone graft materials: an overview of the basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 371:10-27.

[13]BendtsenST, QuinnellSP, WeiM, 2017. Development of a novel alginate-polyvinyl alcohol-hydroxyapatite hydrogel for 3D bioprinting bone tissue engineered scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 105(5):1457-1468.

[14]BerisAE, LykissasMG, KorompiliasAV, et al., 2011. Vascularized fibula transfer for lower limb reconstruction. Microsurgery, 31(3):205-211.

[15]BernhardJ, FergusonJ, RiederB, et al., 2017. Tissue-engineered hypertrophic chondrocyte grafts enhanced long bone repair. Biomaterials, 139:202-212.

[16]BiZG, HanXG, FuCJ, et al., 2008. Reconstruction of large limb bone defects with a double-barrel free vascularized fibular graft. Chin Med J (Engl), 121(23):2424-2428.

[17]BowersKT, KellerJC, RandolphBA, et al., 1992. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7(3):302-310.

[18]BoyanBD, HummertTW, DeanDD, et al., 1996. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials, 17(2):137-146.

[19]BrydoneAS, MeekD, MaclaineS, 2010. Bone grafting, orthopaedic biomaterials, and the clinical need for bone engineering. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 224(12):1329-1343.

[20]BullensPHJ, SchreuderBHW, de Waal MalefijtMC, et al., 2009a. Is an impacted morselized graft in a cage an alternative for reconstructing segmental diaphyseal defects? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 467(3):783-791.

[21]BullensPHJ, SchreuderBHW, de Waal MalefijtMC, et al., 2009b. The stability of impacted morsellized bone grafts in a metal cage under dynamic loaded conditions: an in vitro reconstruction of a segmental diaphyseal bone defect. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 129(5):575-581.

[22]BurkeDP, KellyDJ, 2012. Substrate stiffness and oxygen as regulators of stem cell differentiation during skeletal tissue regeneration: a mechanobiological model. PLoS ONE, 7(7):e40737.

[23]CaoH, KuboyamaN, 2010. A biodegradable porous composite scaffold of PGA/β-TCP for bone tissue engineering. Bone, 46(2):386-395.

[24]CapannaR, CampanacciDA, BelotN, et al., 2007. A new reconstructive technique for intercalary defects of long bones: the association of massive allograft with vascularized fibular autograft. Long-term results and comparison with alternative techniques. Orthop Clin North Am, 38(1):51-60.

[25]CarpenterSR, UritsI, MurthiAM, 2016. Porous metals and alternate bearing surfaces in shoulder arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 9(1):59-66.

[26]CerusoM, TaddeiF, BigazziP, et al., 2008. Vascularised fibula graft inlaid in a massive bone allograft: considerations on the bio-mechanical behaviour of the combined graft in segmental bone reconstructions after sarcoma resection. Injury, 39(Suppl 3):S68-S74.

[27]ChenH, LiuY, WangCY, et al., 2021. Design and properties of biomimetic irregular scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Comput Biol Med, 130:104241.

[28]ChenK, XieXH, TangHY, et al., 2020. In vitro and in vivo degradation behavior of Mg-2Sr-Ca and Mg-2Sr-Zn alloys. Bioact Mater, 5(2):275-285.

[29]ChenYH, ZhouSW, LiQ, 2011. Microstructure design of biodegradable scaffold and its effect on tissue regeneration. Biomaterials, 32(22):5003-5014.

[30]CobosJA, LindseyRW, GugalaZ, 2000. The cylindrical titanium mesh cage for treatment of a long bone segmental defect: description of a new technique and report of two cases. J Orthop Trauma, 14(1):54-59.

[31]CookeME, Ramirez-GarcialunaJL, Rangel-BerridiK, et al., 2020. 3D printed polyurethane scaffolds for the repair of bone defects. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 8:557215.

[32]CooperDML, MatyasJR, KatzenbergMA, et al., 2004. Comparison of microcomputed tomographic and microradiographic measurements of cortical bone porosity. Calcif Tissue Int, 74(5):437-447.

[33]de GradoGF, KellerL, Idoux-GilletY, et al., 2018. Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management. J Tissue Eng, 9:2041731418776819.

[34]de LongWG, EinhornTA, KovalK, et al., 2007. Bone grafts and bone graft substitutes in orthopaedic trauma surgery. A critical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 89(3):649-658.

[35]DennisSC, BerklandCJ, BonewaldLF, et al., 2015. Endochondral ossification for enhancing bone regeneration: converging native extracellular matrix biomaterials and developmental engineering in vivo. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 21(3):247-266.

[36]DimitriouR, JonesE, McGonagleD, et al., 2011. Bone regeneration: current concepts and future directions. BMC Med, 9:66.

[37]DingYF, WenCE, HodgsonP, et al., 2014. Effects of alloying elements on the corrosion behavior and biocompatibility of biodegradable magnesium alloys: a review. J Mater Chem B, 2(14):1912-1933.

[38]DingYF, LiYC, LinJX, et al., 2015. Effects of zirconium and strontium on the biocorrosion of Mg-Zr-Sr alloys for biodegradable implant applications. J Mater Chem B, 3(18):3714-3729.

[39]DivakarlaSK, YamaguchiS, KokuboT, et al., 2018. Improved bioactivity of gummetal^®: Ti₅₉Nb₃₆Ta₂Zr₃O_0.3, via formation of nanostructured surfaces. J Tissue Eng, 9:2041731418774178.

[40]DongL, WangSJ, ZhaoXR, et al., 2017. 3D-printed poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffold integrated with cell-laden chitosan hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Sci Rep, 7:13412.

[41]DouHL, WangGW, XingN, et al., 2016. Repair of large segmental bone defects with fascial flap-wrapped allogeneic bone. J Orthop Surg Res, 11:162.

[42]DouJH, ZhaoYP, LuL, et al., 2018. Effect of the second-step voltages on the structural and corrosion properties of silicon-calcium-phosphate (Si-CaP) coatings on Mg-Zn-Ca alloy. R Soc Open Sci, 5(10):172410.

[43]Faia-TorresAB, Guimond-LischerS, RottmarM, et al., 2014. Differential regulation of osteogenic differentiation of stem cells on surface roughness gradients. Biomaterials, 35(33):9023-9032.

[44]FanJJ, MuTW, QinJJ, et al., 2014. Different effects of implanting sensory nerve or blood vessel on the vascularization, neurotization, and osteogenesis of tissue-engineered bone in vivo. BioMed Res Int, 2014:412570.

[45]FengXB, MaL, LiangH, et al., 2020. Osteointegration of 3D-printed fully porous polyetheretherketone scaffolds with different pore sizes. ACS Omega, 5(41):26655-26666.

[46]FengYF, WangL, LiX, et al., 2012. Influence of architecture of β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds on biological performance in repairing segmental bone defects. PLoS ONE, 7(11):e49955.

[47]FuR, LiuCQ, YanYX, et al., 2021. Bone defect reconstruction via endochondral ossification: a developmental engineering strategy. J Tissue Eng, 12:20417314211004211.

[48]GaneshN, AshokanA, RajeshkannanR, et al., 2014. Magnetic resonance functional nano-hydroxyapatite incorporated poly(caprolactone) composite scaffolds for in situ monitoring of bone tissue regeneration by MRI. Tissue Eng Part A, 20(19-20):2783-2794.

[49]García-GaretaE, CoathupMJ, BlunnGW, 2015. Osteoinduction of bone grafting materials for bone repair and regeneration. Bone, 81:112-121.

[50]GarricX, NotteletB, PineseC, et al., 2017. Biodegradable synthetic polymers for the design of implantable medical devices: the ligamentoplasty case. Med Sci (Paris), 33(1):39-45.

[51]GerhardtLC, BoccacciniAR, 2010. Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials (Basel), 3(7):3867-3910.

[52]GhayorC, ChenTH, BhattacharyaI, et al., 2020. Microporosities in 3D-printed tricalcium-phosphate-based bone substitutes enhance osteoconduction and affect osteoclastic resorption. Int J Mol Sci, 21(23):9270.

[53]GiesslerGA, FriedrichPF, ShinRH, et al., 2009. Healing of free vascularized bone allotransplants: optimizing by short-term immunosuppression and host-derived neovascularization. Unfallchirurg, 112(5):479-486 (in German).

[54]GosainAK, SongLS, YuPR, et al., 2000. Osteogenesis in cranial defects: reassessment of the concept of critical size and the expression of TGF-β isoforms. Plast Reconstr Surg, 106(2):360-371.

[55]GuoBL, MaPX, 2014. Synthetic biodegradable functional polymers for tissue engineering: a brief review. Sci China Chem, 57(4):490-500.

[56]GuoXS, JiangHY, ZongXL, et al., 2020. The implication of the notch signaling pathway in biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic-induced ectopic bone formation: a preliminary experiment. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 108(5):1035-1044.

[57]HabibovicP, de GrootK, 2007. Osteoinductive biomaterials—properties and relevance in bone repair. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 1(1):25-32.

[58]HalimAS, ChaiSC, IsmailWFW, et al., 2015. Long-term outcome of free fibula osteocutaneous flap and massive allograft in the reconstruction of long bone defect. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 68(12):1755-1762.

[59]HamlekhanA, MoztarzadehF, MozafariM, et al., 2011. Preparation of laminated poly(ε-caprolactone)-gelatin-hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffold bioengineered via compound techniques for bone substitution. Biomatter, 1(1):91-101.

[60]HanXT, SharmaN, XuZQ, et al., 2019. An in vitro study of osteoblast response on fused-filament fabrication 3D printed PEEK for dental and cranio-maxillofacial implants. J Clin Med, 8(6):771.

[61]HaugenHJ, LyngstadaasSP, RossiF, et al., 2019. Bone grafts: which is the ideal biomaterial? J Clin Periodontol, 46(Suppl 21):92-102.

[62]HayashiK, KishidaR, TsuchiyaA, et al., 2019. Carbonate apatite micro-honeycombed blocks generate bone marrow-like tissues as well as bone. Adv Biosyst, 3(12):1900140.

[63]HeB, OuYS, ZhouA, et al., 2016. Functionalized D-form self-assembling peptide hydrogels for bone regeneration. Drug Des Devel Ther, 10:1379-1388.

[64]HenkelJ, WoodruffMA, EpariDR, et al., 2013. Bone regeneration based on tissue engineering conceptions—a 21st century perspective. Bone Res, 1(3):216-248.

[65]HollingerJO, KleinschmidtJC, 1990. The critical size defect as an experimental model to test bone repair materials. J Craniofac Surg, 1(1):60-68.

[66]HuYP, DongDL, WangXY, et al., 2021. Synthesis and properties of Mg-Mn-Zn alloys for medical applications. Materials (Basel), 14(8):1855.

[67]HulbertSF, YoungFA, MathewsRS, et al., 1970. Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res, 4(3):433-456.

[68]HutmacherDW, SchantzJT, LamCXF, et al., 2007. State of the art and future directions of scaffold-based bone engineering from a biomaterials perspective. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 1(4):245-260.

[69]InnocentiM, AbedYY, BeltramiG, et al., 2009. Biological reconstruction after resection of bone tumors of the proximal tibia using allograft shell and intramedullary free vascularized fibular graft: long-term results. Microsurgery, 29(5):361-372.

[70]JamesJ, Steijn-MyagkayaGL, 1986. Death of osteocytes. Electron microscopy after in vitro ischaemia. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 68(4):620-624.

[71]JeongJ, KimJH, ShimJH, et al., 2019. Bioactive calcium phosphate materials and applications in bone regeneration. Biomater Res, 23:4.

[72]JiY, HouMD, ZhangJ, et al., 2022. Preparation and properties of partial-degradable ZrO₂-chitosan particles-GeLMA composite scaffolds. Polymers (Basel), 14(19):4233.

[73]KanczlerJM, OreffoROC, 2008. Osteogenesis and angiogenesis: the potential for engineering bone. Eur Cell Mater, 15:100-114.

[74]KarageorgiouV, KaplanD, 2005. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials, 26(27):5474-5491.

[75]KawasakiS, InagakiY, AkahaneM, et al., 2020. In vitro osteogenesis of rat bone marrow mesenchymal cells on peek disks with heat-fixed apatite by CO₂ laser bonding. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 21:692.

[76]KawateK, YajimaH, SugimotoK, et al., 2007. Indications for free vascularized fibular grafting for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 8:78.

[77]KhanFSA, MubarakNM, KhalidM, et al., 2021. Functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes and hydroxyapatite nanorods reinforced with polypropylene for biomedical application. Sci Rep, 11:843.

[78]KhiraYM, BadawyHA, 2013. Pedicled vascularized fibular graft with ilizarov external fixator for reconstructing a large bone defect of the tibia after tumor resection. J Orthop Traumatol, 14(2):91-100.

[79]KimBS, KimJS, YangSS, et al., 2015. Angiogenin-loaded fibrin/bone powder composite scaffold for vascularized bone regeneration. Biomater Res, 19:18.

[80]KimHS, KumbarSG, NukavarapuSP, 2021. Biomaterial-directed cell behavior for tissue engineering. Curr Opin Biomed Eng, 17:100260.

[81]KimKM, KimHY, MiyazakiS, 2020. Effect of Zr content on phase stability, deformation behavior, and Young’s modulus in Ti-Nb-Zr alloys. Materials (Basel), 13(2):476.

[82]KimSY, BaeEB, HuhJW, et al., 2019. Bone regeneration using a three-dimensional hexahedron channeled BCP block combined with bone morphogenic protein-2 in rat calvarial defects. Materials (Basel), 12(15):2435.

[83]KlijnRJ, MeijerGJ, BronkhorstEM, et al., 2010. A meta-analysis of histomorphometric results and graft healing time of various biomaterials compared to autologous bone used as sinus floor augmentation material in humans. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 16(5):493-507.

[84]KnuthC, KiernanC, WolviusE, et al., 2019. Understanding tissue-engineered endochondral ossification; Towards improved bone formation. Eur Cell Mater, 37:277-291.

[85]KoHS, LeeS, JhoJY, 2021. Synthesis and modification of hydroxyapatite nanofiber for poly(lactic acid) composites with enhanced mechanical strength and bioactivity. Nanomaterials (Basel), 11(1):213.

[86]KogawaM, KhalidKA, WijenayakaAR, et al., 2018. Recombinant sclerostin antagonizes effects of ex vivo mechanical loading in trabecular bone and increases osteocyte lacunar size. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 314(1):C53-C61.

[87]KohliN, SharmaV, OreraA, et al., 2021. Pro-angiogenic and osteogenic composite scaffolds of fibrin, alginate and calcium phosphate for bone tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng, 12:20417314211005610.

[88]KolkA, HandschelJ, DrescherW, et al., 2012. Current trends and future perspectives of bone substitute materials ‒ from space holders to innovative biomaterials. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 40(8):706-718.

[89]KorompiliasAV, PaschosNK, LykissasMG, et al., 2011. Recent updates of surgical techniques and applications of free vascularized fibular graft in extremity and trunk reconstruction. Microsurgery, 31(3):171-175.

[90]KovoorCC, JayakumarR, GeorgeVV, et al., 2011. Vascularized fibular graft in infected tibial bone loss. Indian J Orthop, 45(4):330-335.

[91]KuniiT, MoriY, TanakaH, et al., 2019. Improved osseointegration of a TiNbSn alloy with a low Young’s modulus treated with anodic oxidation. Sci Rep, 9:13985.

[92]LeeDJ, LeeYT, ZouR, et al., 2017. Polydopamine-laced biomimetic material stimulation of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells to promote osteogenic effects. Sci Rep, 7:12984.

[93]LevengoodSKL, PolakSJ, WheelerMB, et al., 2010. Multiscale osteointegration as a new paradigm for the design of calcium phosphate scaffolds for bone regeneration. Biomaterials, 31(13):3552-3563.

[94]LiHY, XueK, KongN, et al., 2014. Silicate bioceramics enhanced vascularization and osteogenesis through stimulating interactions between endothelia cells and bone marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials, 35(12):3803-3818.

[95]LiJJ, GilES, HaydenRS, et al., 2013. Multiple silk coatings on biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds: effect on physical and mechanical properties and in vitro osteogenic response of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomacromolecules, 14(7):2179-2188.

[96]LiJP, de WijnJR, van BlitterswijkCA, et al., 2006. Porous Ti₆Al₄V scaffold directly fabricating by rapid prototyping: preparation and in vitro experiment. Biomaterials, 27(8):1223-1235.

[97]LinCH, WeiFC, ChenHC, et al., 1999. Outcome comparison in traumatic lower-extremity reconstruction by using various composite vascularized bone transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg, 104(4):984-992.

[98]LinderHR, GlassAA, DayDE, et al., 2020. Manipulating air-gap electrospinning to create aligned polymer nanofiber-wrapped glass microfibers for cortical bone tissue engineering. Bioengineering (Basel), 7(4):165.

[99]LindseyRW, GugalaZ, MilneE, et al., 2006. The efficacy of cylindrical titanium mesh cage for the reconstruction of a critical-size canine segmental femoral diaphyseal defect. J Orthop Res, 24(7):1438-1453.

[100]LongM, RackHJ, 1998. Titanium alloys in total joint replacement—a materials science perspective. Biomaterials, 19(18):1621-1639.

[101]MaHS, FengC, ChangJ, et al., 2018. 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds: from bone tissue engineering to tumor therapy. Acta Biomater, 79:37-59.

[102]MaQL, MiriZ, HaugenHJ, et al., 2023. Significance of mechanical loading in bone fracture healing, bone regeneration, and vascularization. J Tissue Eng, 14:20417314231172573.

[103]MaYH, GuSJ, YinQD, et al., 2019. Application of multiple wrapped cancellous bone graft methods for treatment of segmental bone defects. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 20:346.

[104]ManfriniM, BindiganavileS, SayF, et al., 2017. Is there benefit to free over pedicled vascularized grafts in augmenting tibial intercalary allograft constructs? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 475(5):1322-1337.

[105]MaradzeD, MussonD, ZhengYF, et al., 2018. High magnesium corrosion rate has an effect on osteoclast and mesenchymal stem cell role during bone remodelling. Sci Rep, 8:10003.

[106]Marí-BuyéN, LuqueT, NavajasD, et al., 2013. Development of a three-dimensional bone-like construct in a soft self-assembling peptide matrix. Tissue Eng Part A, 19(7-8):870-881.

[107]MarínJAT, LondoñoSR, DelgadoJ, et al., 2019. Biocompatible and antimicrobial electrospun membranes based on nanocomposites of chitosan/poly (vinyl alcohol)/graphene oxide. Int J Mol Sci, 20(12):2987.

[108]MarrellaA, LeeTY, LeeDH, et al., 2018. Engineering vascularized and innervated bone biomaterials for improved skeletal tissue regeneration. Mater Today (Kidlington), 21(4):362-376.

[109]MartinRB, 1991. Determinants of the mechanical properties of bones. J Biomech, 24(Suppl 1):79-88.

[110]MiriZ, HaugenHJ, LocaD, et al., 2024. Review on the strategies to improve the mechanical strength of highly porous bone bioceramic scaffolds. J Eur Ceram Soc, 44(1):23-42.

[111]MomessoGAC, de Souza SantosA, SantosJMFE, et al., 2020. Comparison between plasma electrolytic oxidation coating and sandblasted acid-etched surface treatment: histometric, tomographic, and expression levels of osteoclastogenic factors in osteoporotic rats. Materials (Basel), 13(7):1604.

[112]MorganEF, UnnikrisnanGU, HusseinAI, 2018. Bone mechanical properties in healthy and diseased states. Annu Rev Biomed Eng, 20:119-143.

[113]MuiKL, ChenCS, AssoianRK, 2016. The mechanical regulation of integrin-cadherin crosstalk organizes cells, signaling and forces. J Cell Sci, 129(6):1093-1100.

[114]MurshedM, HarmeyD, MillánJL, et al., 2005. Unique coexpression in osteoblasts of broadly expressed genes accounts for the spatial restriction of ECM mineralization to bone. Genes Dev, 19(9):1093-1104.

[115]NikpourP, Salimi-KenariH, FahimipourF, et al., 2018. Dextran hydrogels incorporated with bioactive glass-ceramic: nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym, 190:281-294.

[116]NoYJ, LiJJ, ZreiqatH, 2017. Doped calcium silicate ceramics: a new class of candidates for synthetic bone substitutes. Materials (Basel), 10(2):153.

[117]NoyamaY, NakanoT, IshimotoT, et al., 2013. Design and optimization of the oriented groove on the hip implant surface to promote bone microstructure integrity. Bone, 52(2):659-667.

[118]OgilvieCM, CrawfordEA, HosalkarHS, et al., 2009. Long-term results for limb salvage with osteoarticular allograft reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 467(10):2685-2690.

[119]OuQF, WuPF, ZhouZB, et al., 2020. Complication of osteo reconstruction by utilizing free vascularized fibular bone graft. BMC Surg, 20:216.

[120]OzakiT, HillmannA, WuismanP, et al., 1997. Reconstruction of tibia by ipsilateral vascularized fibula and allograft: 12 cases with malignant bone tumors. Acta Orthop Scand, 68(3):298-301.

[121]PatelDK, JinB, DuttaSD, et al., 2020. Osteogenic potential of human mesenchymal stem cells on eggshells-derived hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater, 108(5):1953-1960.

[122]PedersonWC, PersonDW, 2007. Long bone reconstruction with vascularized bone grafts. Orthop Clin North Am, 38(1):23-35.

[123]Perier-MetzC, DudaGN, ChecaS, 2021. Initial mechanical conditions within an optimized bone scaffold do not ensure bone regeneration―an in silico analysis. Biomech Model Mechanobiol, 20(5):1723-1731.

[124]PitaccoP, SadowskaJM, O'BrienFJ, et al., 2023. 3D bioprinting of cartilaginous templates for large bone defect healing. Acta Biomater, 156:61-74.

[125]PrithivirajanS, NyahaleMB, NaikGM, et al., 2021. Bio-corrosion impacts on mechanical integrity of ZM21 Mg for orthopaedic implant application processed by equal channel angular pressing. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 32(6):65.

[126]RabitschK, Maurer-ErtlW, Pirker-FrühaufU, et al., 2013. Intercalary reconstructions with vascularised fibula and allograft after tumour resection in the lower limb. Sarcoma, 2013:160295.

[127]ReichertJC, WullschlegerME, CipitriaA, et al., 2011. Custom-made composite scaffolds for segmental defect repair in long bones. Int Orthop, 35(8):1229-1236.

[128]RoddyE, DeBaunMR, Daoud-GrayA, et al., 2018. Treatment of critical-sized bone defects: clinical and tissue engineering perspectives. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 28(3):351-362.

[129]Rodríguez-MontañoOL, Cortés-RodríguezCJ, NaddeoF, et al., 2019. Irregular load adapted scaffold optimization: a computational framework based on mechanobiological criteria. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 5(10):5392-5411.

[130]RouwkemaJ, KhademhosseiniA, 2016. Vascularization and angiogenesis in tissue engineering: beyond creating static networks. Trends Biotechnol, 34(9):733-745.

[131]RouwkemaJ, RivronNC, van BlitterswijkCA, 2008. Vascularization in tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol, 26(8):434-441.

[132]SalgadoAJ, CoutinhoOP, ReisRL, 2004. Bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future trends. Macromol Biosci, 4(8):743-765.

[133]SantosMI, ReisRL, 2010. Vascularization in bone tissue engineering: physiology, current strategies, major hurdles and future challenges. Macromol Biosci, 10(1):12-27.

[134]SarutaJ, SatoN, IshijimaM, et al., 2019. Disproportionate effect of sub-micron topography on osteoconductive capability of titanium. Int J Mol Sci, 20(16):4027.

[135]SchmitzJP, HollingerJO, 1986. The critical size defect as an experimental model for craniomandibulofacial nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res, (205):299-308.

[136]SenMK, MiclauT, 2007. Autologous iliac crest bone graft: should it still be the gold standard for treating nonunions? Injury, 38(Suppl 1):S75-S80.

[137]ShenMK, WangLL, GaoY, et al., 2022. 3D bioprinting of in situ vascularized tissue engineered bone for repairing large segmental bone defects. Mater Today Bio, 16:100382.

[138]ShiJP, ZhuLY, LiL, et al., 2018. A TPMS-based method for modeling porous scaffolds for bionic bone tissue engineering. Sci Rep, 8:7395.

[139]ShibaharaK, HayashiK, NakashimaY, et al., 2022. Effects of channels and micropores in honeycomb scaffolds on the reconstruction of segmental bone defects. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 10:825831.

[140]SongGL, 2007. Control of biodegradation of biocompatable magnesium alloys. Corros Sci, 49(4):1696-1701.

[141]StahlA, YangYP, 2021. Regenerative approaches for the treatment of large bone defects. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 27(6):539-547.

[142]SuX, WangT, GuoS, 2021. Applications of 3D printed bone tissue engineering scaffolds in the stem cell field. Regen Ther, 16:63-72.

[143]SunWZ, YeB, ChenSY, et al., 2023. Neuro-bone tissue engineering: emerging mechanisms, potential strategies, and current challenges. Bone Res, 11:65.

[144]SzostakowskiB, DeMaioM, 2020. Ideal xenograft or a perfect bone substitute?—A retrospective review and analysis of the historical concept of ivory implants in orthopaedics. Int Orthop, 44(5):1003-1009.

[145]TansikG, KilicE, BeterM, et al., 2016. A glycosaminoglycan mimetic peptide nanofiber gel as an osteoinductive scaffold. Biomater Sci, 4(9):1328-1339.

[146]TarafderS, DaviesNM, BandyopadhyayA, et al., 2013. 3D printed tricalcium phosphate bone tissue engineering scaffolds: effect of SrO and MgO doping on in vivo osteogenesis in a rat distal femoral defect model. Biomater Sci, 1(12):1250-1259.

[147]ThompsonEM, MatsikoA, FarrellE, et al., 2015. Recapitulating endochondral ossification: a promising route to in vivo bone regeneration. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 9(8):889-902.

[148]TianT, XieWH, GaoWD, et al., 2019. Micro-nano bioactive glass particles incorporated porous scaffold for promoting osteogenesis and angiogenesis in vitro. Front Chem, 7:186.

[149]ToworfeGK, CompostoRJ, LeeMH, et al., 2010. Elastic membrane that undergoes mechanical deformation enhances osteoblast cellular attachment and proliferation. Int J Biomater, 2010:947232.

[150]UnagollaJM, JayasuriyaAC, 2019. Enhanced cell functions on graphene oxide incorporated 3D printed polycaprolactone scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C, 102:1-11.

[151]VenkatramaniH, SabapathySR, DheenadayalanJ, et al., 2015. Reconstruction of post-traumatic long segment bone defects of the lower end of the femur by free vascularized fibula combined with allograft (modified Capanna’s technique). Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 41(1):17-24.

[152]von ErlachTC, BertazzoS, WozniakMA, et al., 2018. Cell-geometry-dependent changes in plasma membrane order direct stem cell signalling and fate. Nat Mater, 17(3):237-242.

[153]WahyuningtyasE, HsuLC, LanWC, et al., 2019. Application of a promising bone graft substitute in bone tissue regeneration: characterization, biocompatibility, and in vivo animal study. BioMed Res Int, 2019:1614024.

[154]WanT, JiaoZX, GuoM, et al., 2020. Gaseous sulfur trioxide induced controllable sulfonation promoting biomineralization and osseointegration of polyetheretherketone implants. Bioact Mater, 5(4):1004-1017.

[155]WangGJ, ShenLD, ZhaoJF, et al., 2018. Design and compressive behavior of controllable irregular porous scaffolds: based on Voronoi-Tessellation and for additive manufacturing. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 4(2):719-727.

[156]WangL, FanHB, ZhangZY, et al., 2010. Osteogenesis and angiogenesis of tissue-engineered bone constructed by prevascularized β-tricalcium phosphate scaffold and mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials, 31(36):9452-9461.

[157]WangR, NiSL, MaL, et al., 2022. Porous construction and surface modification of titanium-based materials for osteogenesis: a review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 10:973297.

[158]WangXD, LiSY, ZhangSJ, et al., 2020. The neural system regulates bone homeostasis via mesenchymal stem cells: a translational approach. Theranostics, 10(11):4839-4850.

[159]WangXH, SuN, 2021. Neurokinin-1-tachykinin receptor agonist promotes diabetic fracture healing in rats with type 1 diabetes via modulation of Wnt/β-catenin signalling axis. Saudi J Biol Sci, 28(4):2139-2145.

[160]WangYF, ZhangW, YaoQQ, 2021. Copper-based biomaterials for bone and cartilage tissue engineering. J Orthop Translat, 29:60-71.

[161]WinklerT, SassFA, DudaGN, et al., 2018. A review of biomaterials in bone defect healing, remaining shortcomings and future opportunities for bone tissue engineering: the unsolved challenge. Bone Joint Res, 7(3):232-243.

[162]WoodardJR, HilldoreAJ, LanSK, et al., 2007. The mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of hydroxyapatite bone scaffolds with multi-scale porosity. Biomaterials, 28(1):45-54.

[163]WuC, FangJG, EntezariA, et al., 2021. A time-dependent mechanobiology-based topology optimization to enhance bone growth in tissue scaffolds. J Biomech, 117:110233.

[164]WuY, JingD, OuyangHW, et al., 2015. Pre-implanted sensory nerve could enhance the neurotization in tissue-engineered bone graft. Tissue Eng Part A, 21(15-16):2241-2249.

[165]XiaoDQ, ZhangJW, ZhangCD, et al., 2020. The role of calcium phosphate surface structure in osteogenesis and the mechanisms involved. Acta Biomater, 106:22-33.

[166]XieYL, SunWC, YanFF, et al., 2019. Icariin-loaded porous scaffolds for bone regeneration through the regulation of the coupling process of osteogenesis and osteoclastic activity. Int J Nanomedicine, 14:6019-6033.

[167]XuJ, HuXY, JiangSY, et al., 2019. The application of multi-walled carbon nanotubes in bone tissue repair hybrid scaffolds and the effect on cell growth in vitro. Polymers (Basel), 11(2):230.

[168]XuYY, HuYY, LiuCY, et al., 2018. A novel strategy for creating tissue-engineered biomimetic blood vessels using 3D bioprinting technology. Materials (Basel), 11(9):1581.

[169]YazdanpanahZ, JohnstonJD, CooperDML, et al., 2022. 3D bioprinted scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state-of-the-art and emerging technologies. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 10:824156.

[170]YuJM, LiK, ZhengXB, et al., 2013. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of zinc-modified Ca-Si-based ceramic coating for bone implants. PLoS ONE, 8(3):e57564.

[171]YuanB, ZhangYX, ZhaoR, et al., 2022. A unique biomimetic modification endows polyetherketoneketone scaffold with osteoinductivity by activating cAMP/PKA signaling pathway. Sci Adv, 8(40):eabq7116.

[172]ZekryKM, YamamotoN, HayashiK, et al., 2019. Reconstruction of intercalary bone defect after resection of malignant bone tumor. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 27(1):2309499019832970.

[173]ZhaiPS, PengXX, LiBQ, et al., 2020. The application of hyaluronic acid in bone regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol, 151:1224-1239.

[174]ZhangB, ZhangPB, WangZL, et al., 2017. Tissue-engineered composite scaffold of poly and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles seeded with autologous mesenchymal stem cells for bone regeneration. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol), 18(11):963-976.

[175]ZhangJW, BarbieriD, HoopenHT, et al., 2015. Microporous calcium phosphate ceramics driving osteogenesis through surface architecture. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 103(3):1188-1199.

[176]ZhangM, MatinlinnaJP, TsoiJKH, et al., 2020. Recent developments in biomaterials for long-bone segmental defect reconstruction: a narrative overview. J Orthop Translat, 22:26-33.

[177]ZhangT, WeiQG, ZhouH, et al., 2021. Three-dimensional-printed individualized porous implants: a new “implant-bone” interface fusion concept for large bone defect treatment. Bioact Mater, 6(11):3659-3670.

[178]ZhangWJ, FengC, YangGZ, et al., 2017. 3D-printed scaffolds with synergistic effect of hollow-pipe structure and bioactive ions for vascularized bone regeneration. Biomaterials, 135:85-95.

[179]ZhaoHY, HanYF, PanC, et al., 2021. Design and mechanical properties verification of gradient Voronoi scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Micromachines (Basel), 12(6):664.

[180]ZhaoZ, LiJC, YaoDR, et al., 2022. Mechanical and permeability properties of porous scaffolds developed by a Voronoi tessellation for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B, 10(46):9699-9712.

[181]ZhongGY, VaeziM, MeiXL, et al., 2019. Strategy for controlling the properties of bioactive poly-ether-ether-ketone/hydroxyapatite composites for bone tissue engineering scaffolds. ACS Omega, 4(21):19238-19245.

[182]ZhuL, LiangHX, LvF, et al., 2021. Design and compressive fatigue properties of irregular porous scaffolds for orthopedics fabricated using selective laser melting. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 7(4):1663-1672.