Full Text:   <2267>

Summary:  <3>

Suppl. Mater.: 

CLC number: 

On-line Access: 2026-03-25

Received: 2025-06-05

Revision Accepted: 2025-09-04

Crosschecked: 2026-03-25

Cited: 0

Clicked: 1719

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714

 ORCID:

Jiajia HUANG

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4816-4560

-   Go to

Article info.
Open peer comments

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A 2026 Vol.27 No.3 P.183-199

http://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2500232


Experience-guided optimization of jacket foundations for offshore wind turbines in varying water depths based on finite element analysis and the genetic algorithm


Author(s):  Jiajia HUANG, Tao JIN, Jianwu HUANG, Shasha SONG, Wei DAI, Chaoqun ZUO, Lizhong WANG, Lilin WANG, Zhen GUO

Affiliation(s):  1. China Energy Engineering Group Zhejiang Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310012, China more

Corresponding email(s):   lilin.wang@zju.edu.cn

Key Words:  Structural optimization, Jacket foundation, Genetic algorithm, Offshore wind power, Population initialization, Parametric modeling


Share this article to: More |Next Article >>>

Jiajia HUANG, Tao JIN, Jianwu HUANG, Shasha SONG, Wei DAI, Chaoqun ZUO, Lizhong WANG, Lilin WANG, Zhen GUO. Experience-guided optimization of jacket foundations for offshore wind turbines in varying water depths based on finite element analysis and the genetic algorithm[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2026, 27(3): 183-199.

@article{title="Experience-guided optimization of jacket foundations for offshore wind turbines in varying water depths based on finite element analysis and the genetic algorithm",
author="Jiajia HUANG, Tao JIN, Jianwu HUANG, Shasha SONG, Wei DAI, Chaoqun ZUO, Lizhong WANG, Lilin WANG, Zhen GUO",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="27",
number="3",
pages="183-199",
year="2026",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A2500232"
}

%0 Journal Article
%T Experience-guided optimization of jacket foundations for offshore wind turbines in varying water depths based on finite element analysis and the genetic algorithm
%A Jiajia HUANG
%A Tao JIN
%A Jianwu HUANG
%A Shasha SONG
%A Wei DAI
%A Chaoqun ZUO
%A Lizhong WANG
%A Lilin WANG
%A Zhen GUO
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 27
%N 3
%P 183-199
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2026
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A2500232

TY - JOUR
T1 - Experience-guided optimization of jacket foundations for offshore wind turbines in varying water depths based on finite element analysis and the genetic algorithm
A1 - Jiajia HUANG
A1 - Tao JIN
A1 - Jianwu HUANG
A1 - Shasha SONG
A1 - Wei DAI
A1 - Chaoqun ZUO
A1 - Lizhong WANG
A1 - Lilin WANG
A1 - Zhen GUO
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 27
IS - 3
SP - 183
EP - 199
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2026
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A2500232


Abstract: 
structural optimization plays a crucial role in reducing the cost of offshore wind power, particularly in deep-water regions where the weight of jacket foundations increases substantially. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the water-depth range that is suitable for jacket foundations, and the threshold where floating foundations become more viable. Existing studies have not quantitatively analyzed how water depth affects jacket foundation mass, and have often struggled to handle the high dimensionality and stringent constraints inherent in jacket foundation optimization problems. In this study, we propose an optimization framework that couples parametric finite element analysis with a genetic algorithm to minimize the mass of jacket foundations based on three actual engineering projects at varying water depths. A novel population initialization strategy incorporating engineering experience-based solutions is introduced to improve convergence efficiency and solution quality. Comparative analysis against preliminary designs and existing offshore wind projects demonstrates the model’s ability to achieve cost-effective solutions, specifically reducing required jacket masses by 18.66%, 20.98%, and 17.22% at depths of 30.06, 60.23, and 89.81 m, respectively. The results reveal a 122.94% increase in jacket mass—from 1431.28 to 3190.90 t—as water depth increases from 30.06 to 89.81 m. The jacket foundation demonstrates superior cost effectiveness in shallow to moderate water depths, as the unit weight per megawatt (MW) of floating foundations is 97.51% and 35.74% higher at water depths of 60.23 and 89.81 m, respectively. Accordingly, the applicable water-depth threshold between the jacket and floating foundations is estimated to be approximately 100 m. The proposed optimization model offers a novel methodology and practical insights for the optimal design of offshore wind turbine support structures in varying marine environments.

结合有限元分析和遗传算法的不同水深海上风机导管架基础经验导向优化

作者:黄佳佳1,2,金涛1,黄建武1,宋沙沙3,4,戴炜1,左超群1,王立忠2,王立林5,国振1
机构:1中国能源建设集团浙江省电力设计院有限公司,中国杭州,310012;2浙江大学,建筑工程学院,中国杭州,310058;3同济大学,土木工程学院,中国上海,200092;4绍兴文理学院,土木工程学院,中国绍兴,312000;5浙江大学,海洋学院,中国舟山,316021
目的:结构优化是降低导管架基础工程造价、推动其向深远海应用拓展的关键路径,但其优化问题具有高维度与强约束特征。本文针对高维度和强约束问题,提出融入工程经验解的混合种群初始化策略,构建参数化有限元与遗传算法耦合的优化模型,阐明水深对导管架基础的定量影响,明确导管架与漂浮式基础的水深适用阈值。
创新点:1.建立面向多工况和多约束的海上风机导管架基础自主寻优模型;2.通过引入工程经验解,提出导管架优化的混合种群初始化策略,提升早期可行率与收敛效率;3.定量分析水深对导管架基础的影响,明确导管架与漂浮式基础的水深适用阈值。
方法:1.利用Python建立导管架基础的结构分析计算机系统(SACS)参数建模与分析程序,并耦合遗传算法形成自动化优化闭环,构建导管架基础优化模型;2.通过引入工程经验解,并与随机和拉丁超立方采样融合,提出导管架优化的混合种群初始化策略;3.基于多种水深的导管架基础最终优化结果,定量分析水深的影响,进而推导出导管架与漂浮式基础的水深适用阈值。
结论:1.引入工程经验的混合初始化策略能够显著提升早期可行性与搜索效率。2.约束主导性分析表明疲劳寿命与一阶固有频率为各水深导管架基础的主要控制条件。3.水深对导管架重量影响显著;导管架在中浅水深具明显成本优势;导管架基础与漂浮式基础的适用水深阈值约为100 m。4.随着水深增加,下部构件应力升高,且最大疲劳损伤位置上移,因此在设计上需同步强化下部承载强度与上部疲劳抗力。

关键词:结构优化;导管架基础;遗传算法;海上风电;种群初始化;参数化模型

Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article

Reference

[1]AchmusM, KuoYS, Abdel-RahmanK, 2009. Behavior of monopile foundations under cyclic lateral load. Computers and Geotechnics, 36(5):725-735.

[2]AlHamaydehM, BarakatS, NasifO, 2017. Optimization of support structures for offshore wind turbines using genetic algorithm with domain-trimming. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017(1):5978375.

[3]American Petroleum Institute (API), 2019a. Planning, Designing, and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Working Stress Design. API Publishing, Washington, USA.

[4]American Petroleum Institute (API), 2019b. Planning, Designing, and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Load and Resistance Factor Design. API Publishing, Washington, USA.

[5]Benítez-SuárezB, Quevedo-ReinaR, ÁlamoGM, et al., 2025. PSO-based design and optimization of jacket substructures for offshore wind turbines. Marine Structures, 101:103759.

[6]ChengXL, LiY, MuK, et al., 2024. Seismic response of tripod suction bucket foundation for offshore wind turbine in sands. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 177:108353.

[7]ChewKH, TaiK, NgEYK, et al., 2016. Analytical gradient-based optimization of offshore wind turbine substructures under fatigue and extreme loads. Marine Structures, 47:23-41.

[8]Det Norske Veritas (DNV), 2021. Support Structures for Wind Turbines, DNV-ST-0126. DNV, Oslo, Norway.

[9]DuYM, KongDQ, WangSL, et al., 2023. Fatigue analysis of jacket foundations for offshore wind turbines. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 44(12):3639-3652 (in Chinese).

[10]DuanBS, GuoCQ, LiuH, 2022. A hybrid genetic-particle swarm optimization algorithm for multi-constraint optimization problems. Soft Computing, 26(21):11695-11711.

[11]EstebanMD, CouñagoB, López-GutiérrezJS, et al., 2015. Gravity based support structures for offshore wind turbine generators: review of the installation process. Ocean Engineering, 110:281-291.

[12]EstebanMD, López-GutiérrezJS, NegroV, 2019. Gravity-based foundations in the offshore wind sector. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 7(3):64.

[13]FengS, SongYP, ZhangRX, 2000. Optimum design of structure shape for offshore jacket platforms. China Ocean Engineering, 14(4):435-445.

[14]GavinK, IgoeD, DohertyP, 2011. Piles for offshore wind turbines: a state-of-the-art review. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 164(4):245-256.

[15]GentilsT, WangL, KoliosA, 2017. Integrated structural optimisation of offshore wind turbine support structures based on finite element analysis and genetic algorithm. Applied Energy, 199:187-204.

[16]GoldbergDE, 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing, Boston, USA.

[17]GrecuS, IbsenLB, BarariA, 2021. Winkler springs for axial response of suction bucket foundations in cohesionless soil. Soils and Foundations, 61(1):64-79.

[18]HongS, McMorlandJ, ZhangHX, et al., 2024. Floating offshore wind farm installation, challenges and opportunities: a comprehensive survey. Ocean Engineering, 304:117793.

[19]JalbiS, BhattacharyaS, 2020. Concept design of jacket foundations for offshore wind turbines in 10 steps. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 139:106357.

[20]JindalS, RahmanliU, AleemM, et al., 2024. Geotechnical challenges in monopile foundations and performance assessment of current design methodologies. Ocean Engineering, 310:118469.

[21]LiD, SunT, YiC, et al., 2025. Development of deep-sea floating wind power technology. Strategic Study of CAE, 27(2):108-122 (in Chinese).

[22]LiZC, HuP, MaJX, et al., 2022. Analysis and prospect of offshore wind power development in China. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 34(5):229-236 (in Chinese).

[23]LiZY, XuB, YuanGK, 2024. Optimization for offshore prestressed concrete-steel hybrid wind turbine support structure with pile foundation using a parallel modified particle swarm algorithm. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(5):826.

[24]LiuYC, LiSW, YiQ, et al., 2016. Developments in semi-submersible floating foundations supporting wind turbines: a comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60:433-449.

[25]LuhGC, LinCY, 2008. Optimal design of truss structures using ant algorithm. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 36(4):365-379.

[26]OhKY, NamW, RyuMS, et al., 2018. A review of foundations of offshore wind energy convertors: current status and future perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 88:16-36.

[27]PiirainenA, de AndresA, HamiltonS, 2020. E&P Offshore: Fixed or Floating Foundations—Which Brings Value for Money in Deeper Water? https://www.hartenergy.com/exclusives/ep-offshore-fixed-or-floating-foundations-which-brings-value-money-deeper-water-188314.

[28]Rizk-AllahRM, SnášelV, DengXF, et al., 2024. Topological optimization of offshore wind farm cable routing system based on an improved equilibrium optimization algorithm. Ocean Engineering, 313:119539.

[29]SakaMP, HasançebiO, EserH, et al., 2025. Historical evolution of structural optimization techniques for steel skeletal structures including industrial design applications. Engineering Optimization, 57(1):69-129.

[30]ShemshakiE, HaddadMH, MashayekhiM, et al., 2025. A novel hybrid metaheuristic MPA-PSO to optimize the properties of viscous dampers. Buildings, 15(8):1330.

[31]ShiW, ParkH, ChungC, et al., 2013. Load analysis and comparison of different jacket foundations. Renewable Energy, 54:201-210.

[32]SyalsabilaF, PrastiantoRW, RosyidDM, 2022. Sizing optimization using genetic algorithm to achieve minimal offshore structure. Rekayasa, 15(2):129-136.

[33]TianXJ, SunXY, LiuGJ, et al., 2022. Optimization design of the jacket support structure for offshore wind turbine using topology optimization method. Ocean Engineering, 243:110084.

[34]WangL, LiuYG, LiZS, et al., 2023. Non-probabilistic reliability-based topology optimization (NRBTO) scheme for continuum structures based on the strength constraint parameterized level set method and interval mathematics. Thin-Walled Structures, 188:110856.

[35]WilliamsR, ZhaoF, 2024. Global Offshore Wind Report 2024. Global Wind Energy Council, Brussels, Belgium.

[36]YuY, WeiMX, YuJX, et al., 2023. Reliability-based design method for marine structures combining topology, shape, and size optimization. Ocean Engineering, 286:115490.

[37]ZhouYM, ZhangJH, LongK, et al., 2025. Topology optimization on a jacket structure for offshore wind turbines by altering structural design domain. Applied Ocean Research, 154:104421.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion

<1>

Please provide your name, email address and a comment





Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - 2026 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE