Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A 2026 Vol.27 No.10 P.1153-1168

http://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2500581


Evaluating and predicting tunnel overbreak by integrating cloud modeling and fuzzy evaluation theory


Author(s):  Shibin YAO,Jian ZHOU,Biao HE,Chuanqi LI

Affiliation(s):  1. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China more

Corresponding email(s):   j.zhou@csu.edu.cn, chuanqi.li@csu.edu.cn

Key Words:  Tunnel overbreak, Risk assessment, Cloud model, Fuzzy theory, Ridge regression


Shibin YAO, Jian ZHOU, Biao HE, Chuanqi LI. Evaluating and predicting tunnel overbreak by integrating cloud modeling and fuzzy evaluation theory[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2026, 27(10): 1153-1168.

@article{title="Evaluating and predicting tunnel overbreak by integrating cloud modeling and fuzzy evaluation theory",
author="Shibin YAO, Jian ZHOU, Biao HE, Chuanqi LI",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="27",
number="10",
pages="1153-1168",
year="2026",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A2500581"
}

%0 Journal Article
%T Evaluating and predicting tunnel overbreak by integrating cloud modeling and fuzzy evaluation theory
%A Shibin YAO
%A Jian ZHOU
%A Biao HE
%A Chuanqi LI
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 27
%N 10
%P 1153-1168
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2026
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A2500581

TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating and predicting tunnel overbreak by integrating cloud modeling and fuzzy evaluation theory
A1 - Shibin YAO
A1 - Jian ZHOU
A1 - Biao HE
A1 - Chuanqi LI
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 27
IS - 10
SP - 1153
EP - 1168
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2026
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A2500581


Abstract: 
Tunnel overbreak is a common but unfavorable phenomenon in drill-and-blast excavation, leading to increased construction costs, delayed schedules, and potential stability risks. Accurate evaluation and prediction of overbreak are therefore important for tunnel construction control. In this paper, we propose a cloud-model-based comprehensive evaluation and prediction framework developed by integrating fuzzy evaluation theory with subjective and objective weighting methods. A dataset containing 523 records from the HuXiTai (HXT) Tunnel was used, and seven routinely obtainable geological and blasting indicators were selected to construct the evaluation system. Eight weighting strategies were compared, including conventional objective methods, expert judgment, and a ridge-regression-based objective method. The best-performing objective weights were further combined with subjective weights to establish the final comprehensive evaluation model. The results show that the proposed model achieved an overbreak evaluation accuracy of 85.28%. In addition, the comprehensive evaluation score showed a strong linear relationship with the measured overbreak area, yielding a prediction coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.85. The cloud model representation further enabled intuitive visualization of overbreak risk levels and transitional characteristics between adjacent grades. Overall, the proposed framework provides a practical and interpretable tool for overbreak risk evaluation and quantitative prediction in tunnel blasting construction.

基于云模型与模糊评价理论的隧道超挖综合评价与预测方法

作者:姚世斌1,周健1,何彪2,李传奇1
机构:1中南大学,资源与安全工程学院,中国长沙,410083;2科克大学,土木、结构与环境工程系,爱尔兰科克,T12 K8AF
目的:钻爆法隧道施工过程中,在地质条件、钻孔精度、装药结构和爆破参数等因素的共同影响下会出现超挖,导致实际开挖轮廓超出设计边界,进而增加出渣、回填和支护成本,并可能影响围岩稳定性与施工安全。本文旨在针对隧道超挖评价中指标多源、边界模糊和等级过渡不确定等问题,建立一种融合云模型、模糊评价理论和主客观组合赋权的综合评价与预测方法,实现隧道超挖风险等级识别、等级过渡特征表征和超挖面积定量预测,为钻爆法隧道施工中的超挖控制和爆破参数优化提供参考。
创新点:1.建立考虑地质条件与爆破参数的隧道超挖多指标评价体系;2.对比多种客观赋权方法,并将最优客观权重与专家主观权重融合,构建综合评价模型;3.通过云模型实现超挖风险等级及等级过渡的可视化表达;4.建立综合评价得分与超挖面积之间的预测关系。
方法:1.基于HuXiTai隧道523组现场数据,选取围岩质量评分、断面面积、装药深度比、单位耗药量、循环进尺、炮孔密度和炮孔深度7个指标,建立隧道超挖评价指标体系(图4);2.采用多种客观赋权方法和专家主观赋权方法计算指标权重,并通过评价准确率筛选最优客观赋权结果,进一步构建主客观融合的综合评价模型(表1);3.利用云模型生成超挖风险等级云图,对实测超挖面积及综合评价结果进行可视化分析,并表征超挖风险等级及相邻等级过渡特征(图10~13);4.以综合评价得分为自变量,实测超挖面积为因变量建立线性回归模型,得到超挖面积预测公式(公式(9)),并验证综合评价得分对超挖面积的预测能力(图14)。
结论:1.岭回归赋权方法在客观赋权方法中表现最优,评价准确率为83.75%;融合专家主观权重后,综合评价模型的评价准确率提高至85.28%。2.云模型评价结果表明,HuXiTai隧道整体超挖风险位于中风险至中高风险之间,且具有相邻等级过渡特征。3.基于指标众数的综合评价结果与实测超挖面积评价结果更为接近,说明所建模型能够较好反映隧道超挖风险状态。4.综合评价得分与实测超挖面积之间具有明显线性关系,且预测模型的R2为0.85,因此可用于超挖面积定量预测。

关键词:隧道超挖;风险评价;云模型;模糊评价;岭回归

Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article

Reference

[1]Armaghani DJ, Asteris PG, 2021. A comparative study of ANN and ANFIS models for the prediction of cement-based mortar materials compressive strength. Neural Computing and Applications, 33(9):4501-4532.

[2]Asteris PG, Apostolopoulou M, Armaghani DJ, et al., 2020. On the metaheuristic models for the prediction of cement-metakaolin mortars compressive strength. Metaheuristic Computing and Applications, 1(1):63-99.

[3]Asteris PG, Skentou AD, Bardhan A, et al., 2021. Predicting concrete compressive strength using hybrid ensembling of surrogate machine learning models. Cement and Concrete Research, 145:106449.

[4]Asteris PG, Tsavdaridis KD, Lemonis ME, et al., 2024. AI-powered GUI for prediction of axial compression capacity in concrete-filled steel tube columns. Neural Computing and Applications, 36(35):22429-22459.

[5]Barton N, 2002. Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterisation and tunnel design. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 39(2):185-216.

[6]Benzaamia A, Ghrici M, Rebouh R, et al., 2024. Predicting the shear strength of rectangular RC beams strengthened with externally-bonded FRP composites using constrained monotonic neural networks. Engineering Structures, 313:118192.

[7]Benzaamia A, Ghrici M, Rebouh R, et al., 2025. Prediction of chloride resistance level in concrete using optimized tree-based machine learning models. Bulletin of Computational Intelligence, 1(1):104-117.

[8]Bi S, Wang L, Li YR, et al., 2021. A comprehensive method for water environment assessment considering trends of water quality. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021(1):5548113.

[9]Chen C, Zhou J, Zhou T, et al., 2021. Evaluation of vertical shaft stability in underground mines: comparison of three weight methods with uncertainty theory. Natural Hazards, 109(2):1457-1479.

[10]Chen C, Yao SB, Zhou J, 2025. Comparison of rock spalling evaluation in underground openings: uncertainty-based mathematical model and empirical method. Deep Resources Engineering, 2(2):100171.

[11]Chen JH, Qiu WG, Zhao XW, et al., 2021. Experimental and numerical investigation on overbreak control considering the influence of initial support in tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 115:104017.

[12]Daraei A, Zare S, 2018. Prediction of overbreak depth in Ghalaje Road Tunnel using strength factor. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 28(4):679-684.

[13]Dey K, Murthy VMSR, 2012. Prediction of blast-induced overbreak from uncontrolled burn-cut blasting in tunnels driven through medium rock class. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 28:49-56.

[14]Dong YP, Ren JG, Zhang ZF, et al., 2022. Development strategy of geology in next 5-10 years: trends and countermeasures. Chinese Science Bulletin, 67(23):2708-2718 (in Chinese).

[15]Foderà GM, Voza A, Barovero G, et al., 2020. Factors influencing overbreak volumes in drill-and-blast tunnel excavation. A statistical analysis applied to the case study of the Brenner Base Tunnel–BBT. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 105:103475.

[16]Friedman JH, Hastie T, Tibshirani R, 2010. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software, 33(1):1-22.

[17]Ganesan G, Mishra AK, 2021. Assessment of drilling inaccuracy and delineation of constructional and geological overbreak. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 108:103730.

[18]Ghani S, Sapkota SC, Singh RK, et al., 2024. Modelling and validation of liquefaction potential index of fine-grained soils using ensemble learning paradigms. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 177:108399.

[19]Gong S, Yao SB, Xi FR, et al., 2022. A comparison of research methods to determine the sustainability of mineral resources in Henan Province based on cloud analysis. Sustainability, 14(23):15834.

[20]Gong S, Fan GD, Chen JS, et al., 2026a. Anisotropy of fracture behavior and 3D fracture surface morphology of Qinshui coal: laboratory experiments. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 145:105623.

[21]Gong S, Zhang HS, Sun SY, et al., 2026b. Effects of irregular holes defect on the entire dynamic progressive fracture process of SCT limestone in split Hopkinson pressure bar tests: laboratory experiments and FEM modeling. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, 12(1):2.

[22]He B, Armaghani DJ, Lai SH, 2023. Assessment of tunnel blasting-induced overbreak: a novel metaheuristic-based random forest approach. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 133:104979.

[23]He B, Armaghani DJ, Lai SH, et al., 2024a. Applying data augmentation technique on blast-induced overbreak prediction: resolving the problem of data shortage and data imbalance. Expert Systems with Applications, 237:121616.

[24]He B, Armaghani DJ, Lai SH, et al., 2024b. A deep dive into tunnel blasting studies between 2000 and 2023—a systematic review. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 147:105727.

[25]Hong ZX, Tao M, Cui XJ, et al., 2023a. Experimental and numerical studies of the blast-induced overbreak and underbreak in underground roadways. Underground Space, 8:61-79.

[26]Hong ZX, Tao M, Liu LL, et al., 2023b. An intelligent approach for predicting overbreak in underground blasting operation based on an optimized XGBoost model. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 126:107097.

[27]Hong ZX, Tao M, Zhao R, et al., 2023c. Investigation on overbreak and underbreak of pre-stressed tunnels under the impact of decoupled charge blasting. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 182:104784.

[28]Im H, Kurauchi T, Sato N, et al., 2025. Tunnel overbreak prediction: an integrated approach using 3D photogrammetry and machine learning. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 42(3):1441-1457.

[29]Jang H, Topal E, 2013. Optimizing overbreak prediction based on geological parameters comparing multiple regression analysis and artificial neural network. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 38:161-169.

[30]Jang H, Kawamura Y, Shinji U, 2019. An empirical approach of overbreak resistance factor for tunnel blasting. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 92:103060.

[31]Jang HD, 2020. Tunnel overbreak management system using overbreak resistance factor. Tunnel and Underground Space, 30(1):63-75.

[32]Kim Y, Moon HK, 2013. Application of the guideline for overbreak control in granitic rock masses in Korean tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 35:67-77.

[33]Koopialipoor M, Ghaleini EN, Haghighi M, et al., 2019. Overbreak prediction and optimization in tunnel using neural network and bee colony techniques. Engineering with Computers, 35(4):1191-1202.

[34]Krishnan AR, Kasim MM, Hamid R, et al., 2021. A modified CRITIC method to estimate the objective weights of decision criteria. Symmetry, 13(6):973.

[35]Le TT, Skentou AD, Mamou A, et al., 2022. Correlating the unconfined compressive strength of rock with the compressional wave velocity effective porosity and Schmidt hammer rebound number using artificial neural networks. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 55(11):6805-6840.

[36]Lee SJ, Choi SO, Lee S, et al., 2016. Analysis of blasting overbreak using stereo photogrammetry in an underground mine. Tunnel and Underground Space, 26(5):348-362.

[37]Lei ZY, Guo JY, Zheng F, et al., 2022. Thyristor state evaluation method based on kernel principal component analysis. IEEE Access, 10:29992-30004.

[38]Li DY, Liu CY, Gan WY, 2009. A new cognitive model: cloud model. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 24(3):357-375.

[39]Li SC, Wu J, 2019. A multi-factor comprehensive risk assessment method of karst tunnels and its engineering application. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 78(3):1761-1776.

[40]Li ZQ, Li Z, Huang WW, et al., 2023. Study on influence of key blasthole parameters on tunnel overbreak. Underground Space, 9:76-90.

[41]Liang LW, Wang ZB, Li JX, 2019. The effect of urbanization on environmental pollution in rapidly developing urban agglomerations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237:117649.

[42]Liu WJ, An YL, Zhou J, 2024. Study on potential collapse of deep-buried tunnel induced by local overbreak obeying Hoek-Brown failure criterion. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 145:105586.

[43]Liu YS, Li A, Zhang H, et al., 2023. Minimization of overbreak in different tunnel sections through predictive modeling and optimization of blasting parameters. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 11:1255384.

[44]Mandal SK, Singh MM, 2009. Evaluating extent and causes of overbreak in tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 24(1):22-36.

[45]Mottahedi A, Sereshki F, Ataei M, 2018. Development of overbreak prediction models in drill and blast tunneling using soft computing methods. Engineering with Computers, 34(1):45-58.

[46]Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H, 2013. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(2):133-142.

[47]Sarir P, Chen J, Asteris PG, et al., 2021. Developing GEP tree-based, neuro-swarm, and whale optimization models for evaluation of bearing capacity of concrete-filled steel tube columns. Engineering with Computers, 37(1):1-19.

[48]Sun SR, Liu JM, Wei JH, 2013. Predictions of overbreak blocks in tunnels based on the wavelet neural network method and the geological statistics theory. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013(1):706491.

[49]Taheri S, Topal E, Nguyen H, et al., 2025. Predicting overbreak and underbreak in underground longhole stoping using meta-soft computing models. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 164:106852.

[50]Torres VFN, Da Gama CD, Sotomayor JMG, 2023. Post-work inspection for overbreak in tunnels: a case study application to the Alqueva hydroelectric plant. Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 18(1):80-89.

[51]Verma HK, Samadhiya NK, Singh M, et al., 2018. Blast induced rock mass damage around tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 71:149-158.

[52]Xiao FY, Cao ZH, Lin CT, 2023. A complex weighted discounting multisource information fusion with its application in pattern classification. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(8):7609-7623.

[53]Yang XY, Wang H, Gu YQ, et al., 2024. Comprehensive assessment and empirical research on green and low-carbon technologies in the steel industry. Processes, 12(2):397.

[54]Yao SB, Li XY, Zhou J, et al., 2025a. Graded evaluation and optimal scheme selection of mine rock diggability based on the multidimensional cloud model. Machines, 13(11):1019.

[55]Yao SB, Zhou J, Khandelwal M, et al., 2025b. Intelligent decision framework for booster fan optimization in underground coal mines: hybrid spherical fuzzy-cloud model approach enhancing ventilation safety and operational efficiency. Machines, 13(5):367.

[56]Zeng J, Roussis PC, Mohammed AS, et al., 2021. Prediction of peak particle velocity caused by blasting through the combinations of boosted-CHAID and SVM models with various kernels. Applied Sciences, 11(8):3705.

[57]Zhang YW, Zhang YD, Song ZP, et al., 2024. A LFPP-FAHP based evaluation model of blasting scheme for tunnel undercrossing existing buildings. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 153:105937.

[58]Zhao J, Nguyen H, Nguyen-Thoi T, et al., 2022. Improved Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation neural network by particle swarm and whale optimization algorithms to predict the deflection of RC beams. Engineering with Computers, 38(S5):3847-3869.

[59]Zhao Q, Du YX, Zhang TT, et al., 2021. Resilience index system and comprehensive assessment method for distribution network considering multi-energy coordination. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 133:107211.

[60]Zhao YG, Zhong WQ, 2009. A quality evaluation method for existing carbonated reinforced concrete members. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 5(2):137-144.

[61]Zhou J, Asteris PG, Armaghani DJ, et al., 2020. Prediction of ground vibration induced by blasting operations through the use of the Bayesian network and random forest models. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 139:106390.

[62]Zhou J, Chen C, Armaghani DJ, et al., 2022a. Developing a hybrid model of information entropy and unascertained measurement theory for evaluation of the excavatability in rock mass. Engineering with Computers, 38(1):247-270.

[63]Zhou J, Chen C, Wei C, et al., 2022b. An improved connection cloud model of an updated database: a multicriteria uncertainty model for coal burst liability evaluation. Natural Resources Research, 31(3):1687-1704.

[64]Zhou J, Chen C, Du K, et al., 2022c. A new hybrid model of information entropy and unascertained measurement with different membership functions for evaluating destressability in burst-prone underground mines. Engineering with Computers, 38(S1):381-399.

[65]Zhou J, Chen C, Khandelwal M, et al., 2022d. Novel approach to evaluate rock mass fragmentation in block caving using unascertained measurement model and information entropy with flexible credible identification criterion. Engineering with Computers, 38(S5):3789-3809.

[66]Zhou J, Yao SB, Monjezi M, et al., 2026. Comprehensive evaluation and prediction model for blasting fragmentation in mining based on fuzzy theory and multiple weighting methods. Natural Resources Research, 35(1):653-677.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion

<1>

Please provide your name, email address and a comment





Full Text:   <512>

Summary:  <25>

Suppl. Mater.: 

CLC number: 

On-line Access: 2026-11-04

Received: 2025-11-13

Revision Accepted: 2026-05-02

Crosschecked: 0000-00-00

Cited: 0

Clicked: 763

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714

 ORCID:

Jian ZHOU

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4769-4487

Chuanqi LI

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8163-5432

Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - 2026 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE