Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B 2026 Vol.27 No.8 P.906-917

http://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B2400560


A novel drill-milling technology for robot-assisted implant osteotomy preparation: simulation and an ex vivo validation study


Author(s):  Chaofan LI, Kangjie CHENG, Chenhao YU, Russell WANG, Fudong ZHU, Yunfeng LIU

Affiliation(s):  1. College of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China more

Corresponding email(s):   chengkangjie@zjut.edu.cn, liuyf76@126.com

Key Words:  Drill-milling technology, Robot-assisted drilling, Implant osteotomy preparation, Finite-element analysis, Temperature control


Chaofan LI, Kangjie CHENG, Chenhao YU, Russell WANG, Fudong ZHU, Yunfeng LIU. A novel drill-milling technology for robot-assisted implant osteotomy preparation: simulation and an ex vivo validation study[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2026, 27(8): 906-917.

@article{title="A novel drill-milling technology for robot-assisted implant osteotomy preparation: simulation and an ex vivo validation study",
author="Chaofan LI, Kangjie CHENG, Chenhao YU, Russell WANG, Fudong ZHU, Yunfeng LIU",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
volume="27",
number="8",
pages="906-917",
year="2026",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.B2400560"
}

%0 Journal Article
%T A novel drill-milling technology for robot-assisted implant osteotomy preparation: simulation and an ex vivo validation study
%A Chaofan LI
%A Kangjie CHENG
%A Chenhao YU
%A Russell WANG
%A Fudong ZHU
%A Yunfeng LIU
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 27
%N 8
%P 906-917
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2026
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.B2400560

TY - JOUR
T1 - A novel drill-milling technology for robot-assisted implant osteotomy preparation: simulation and an ex vivo validation study
A1 - Chaofan LI
A1 - Kangjie CHENG
A1 - Chenhao YU
A1 - Russell WANG
A1 - Fudong ZHU
A1 - Yunfeng LIU
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 27
IS - 8
SP - 906
EP - 917
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2026
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.B2400560


Abstract: 
ObjectiveExcessive frictional heat generated at the drill–bone interface during implant osteotomy can compromise osseointegration and lead to implant failure. This study’s objective was to use a helical milling technique for dental implant osteotomy preparation to mitigate thermal damage to the bone.
MethodsThis study introduces a novel helical milling technique designed to minimize thermal damage to bone during dental implant osteotomy preparations. Finite element simulations were conducted to compare the thermal distribution and cutting stress of a conventional twist drill and the newly designed helical drill. The experimental validation was performed ex vivo on animal bone using a robot-assisted osteotomy system.
ResultsThe finite element simulations revealed that the helical drill produced a maximum cutting stress of 128.9 MPa, higher than the 121.0 MPa generated by the twist drill, indicating improved cutting efficiency. The ex vivo study demonstrated that the helical milling technique maintained the drilling site temperature below 38.7 °C, which was significantly lower than the clinically critical threshold of 47 °C and the 61 °C recorded with the twist drill. Furthermore, the helical milling process facilitated efficient bone chip removal, reducing thermal buildup.
ConclusionsThese findings suggest that the helical milling tool and technique optimize robot-assisted osteotomy and effectively mitigate frictional heat generation at the drill–bone interface. This innovation holds promise for enhancing osseointegration success rates in dental implant procedures, offering a clinically viable solution to a long-standing challenge in implantology.

机器人辅助牙种植窝洞制备的新型钻铣技术: 仿真和离体动物骨骼实验验证研究

李超凡1,2,3,程康杰1,2,3,於辰浩1,2,3,Russell WANG4,朱赴东5,刘云峰1,2,3
1浙江工业大学机械工程学院,中国杭州,310023
2特种装备与先进加工技术浙江省/教育部重点实验室(浙江工业大学),中国杭州,310023
3高端激光制造装备省部共建协同创新中心(国家"2011计划"),浙江工业大学,中国杭州,310023
4凯斯西储大学口腔医学院综合治疗系,美国俄亥俄州克利夫兰,44106-4905
5浙江大学医学院附属口腔医院,中国杭州,310006
摘要:在牙种植窝制备过程中,钻头与骨组织界面产生的过多摩擦热会损害骨愈合,进而导致种植体失败。本研究旨在使用机器人螺旋铣削技术进行牙种植窝的制备,以减轻对骨组织的热损伤。通过有限元分析,比较了传统麻花钻和新型螺旋铣所产生的热分布和切削应力,并利用机器人辅助铣削系统在动物骨骼上进行了离体实验验证。仿真结果显示,螺旋铣产生的最大切削应力为128.9 MPa,高于麻花钻产生的121.0 MPa,表明切削效率有所提高。离体骨骼实验进一步表明,螺旋铣削技术将制孔部位温度保持在38.7 ℃以下,远低于临床临界阈值47 ℃及麻花钻记录的61 ℃。此外,螺旋铣削过程有助于排出骨屑,从而减少热量积聚。研究结果表明,螺旋铣削技术优化了机器人辅助备孔过程,有效减轻了刀具-骨组织界面的摩擦热产生。该项创新技术在提高牙种植体骨结合成功率方面展现出潜在优势,为牙种植领域长期存在的一些挑战提供了具有临床可行性的解决方案。

关键词:钻铣复合技术;机器人辅助备孔;种植窝洞制备;有限元分析;温度控制

Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article

Reference

[1]AhmadP, AlamMK, AldajaniA, et al., 2021. Dental robotics: a disruptive technology. Sensors, 21(10):3308.

[2]Al-AbdullahKI, LimCP, NajdovskiZ, et al., 2019. A model-based bone milling state identification method via force sensing for a robotic surgical system. Int J Med Robot Comp, 15(3):e1989.

[3]Al-AbdullahKIAL, AbdiH, LimCP, et al., 2018. Force and temperature modelling of bone milling using artificial neural networks. Measurement, 116:25-37.

[4]AlamK, MitrofanovAV, SilberschmidtVV, 2009. Finite element analysis of forces of plane cutting of cortical bone. Comput Mater Sci, 46(3):738-743.

[5]BahramiR, PourhajibagherM, NikpartoN, et al., 2024. Robot-assisted dental implant surgery procedure: a literature review. J Dent Sci, 19(3):1359-1368.

[6]BarmanA, AdhikariR, BolarG, 2020. Evaluation of conventional drilling and helical milling for processing of holes in titanium alloy Ti6Al4V. Mater Today Proc, 28:2295-2300.

[7]BarryJ, ByrneG, 2002. The mechanisms of chip formation in machining hardened steels. J Manuf Sci Eng, 124(3):528-535.

[8]BrinksmeierE, FangmannS, RentschR, 2011. Drilling of composites and resulting surface integrity. CIRP Ann, 60(1):57-60.

[9]BuserD, SennerbyL, de BruynH, 2017. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontology 2000, 73(1):7-21.

[10]ChangCS, 2007. Prediction of the cutting temperatures of stainless steel with chamfered main cutting edge tools. J Mater Process Technol, 190(1-3):332-341.

[11]ChenG, GaoQ, YangXP, et al., 2022. Investigation of heat partition and instantaneous temperature in milling of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Manuf Process, 80:302-319.

[12]ChenQS, DaiL, LiuY, et al., 2020. A cortical bone milling force model based on orthogonal cutting distribution method. Adv Manuf, 8(2):204-215.

[13]ChenT, LiuJQ, LiuG, et al., 2023. Experimental study on titanium alloy cutting property and wear mechanism with circular-arc milling cutters. Chin J Mech Eng, 36:57.

[14]ChenYC, TuYK, TsaiYJ, et al., 2018. Assessment of thermal necrosis risk regions for different bone qualities as a function of drilling parameters. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 162:253-261.

[15]ChengKJ, KanTS, LiuYF, et al., 2021. Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: an in-vitro study. Comput Biol Med, 129:104153.

[16]ConwardM, SamuelJ, 2016. Machining characteristics of the haversian and plexiform components of bovine cortical bone. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 60:525-534.

[17]HaddadM, ZitouneR, EymaF, et al., 2014. Study of the surface defects and dust generated during trimming of CFRP: influence of tool geometry, machining parameters and cutting speed range. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf, 66:142-154.

[18]HuangSN, ShieMY, ShenYW, et al., 2019. Biomechanical assessment of design parameters on a self-developed 3D-printed titanium-alloy reconstruction/prosthetic implant for mandibular segmental osteotomy defect. Metals, 9(5):597.

[19]IsbilirO, GhassemiehE, 2012. Finite element analysis of drilling of carbon fibre reinforced composites. Appl Compos Mater, 19(3-4):637-656.

[20]JiangZL, QiXZ, SunY, et al., 2020. Cutting depth monitoring based on milling force for robot-assisted laminectomy. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng, 17(1):2-14.

[21]KanTS, ChengKJ, LiuYF, et al., 2022. Evaluation of a custom-designed human-robot collaboration control system for dental implant robot. Int J Med Robot Comp Assisted Surg, 18(1):e2346.

[22]KarmaniS, 2006. The thermal properties of bone and the effects of surgical intervention. Curr Orthop, 20(1):52-58.

[23]KarnikAP, ChhajerH, VenkateshSB, 2024. Transforming Prosthodontics and oral implantology using robotics and artificial intelligence. Front Oral Health, 5:1442100.

[24]LeeJ, RabinY, OzdoganlarOB, 2011. A new thermal model for bone drilling with applications to orthopaedic surgery. Med Eng Phys, 33(10):1234-1244.

[25]LeeJ, ChavezCL, ParkJ, 2018. Parameters affecting mechanical and thermal responses in bone drilling: a review. J Biomech, 71:4-21.

[26]LiuJ, TangXK, LiSP, et al., 2022. Optimization of multi-tooth milling tool for interlaminar damage suppression in the milling of carbon fiber-reinforced polymers. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 121(1-2):1235-1251.

[27]LiuSN, WuD, ZhaoJ, et al., 2022. Novel crescent drill design and mechanistic force modeling for thrust force reduction in bone drilling. Med Eng Phys, 103:103795.

[28]MalvisiA, VendruscoloP, MoriciF, et al., 2000. Milling versus sawing: comparison of temperature elevation and clinical performance during bone cutting. In: Delp SL, DiGoia AM, Jaramaz B (Eds.), Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1935. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, p.1238-1244.

[29]MassoumiF, TaftiAA, MirdehghanSM, 2019. Heat caused by dental implant fixture seating: temperature in vitro and software simulation. J Long-Term Eff Med Implants, 29(4):303-310.

[30]ParkSY, ShinSY, YangSM, et al., 2010. Effect of implant drill design on the particle size of the bone collected during osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 39(10):1007-1011.

[31]PereiraRBD, BrandãoLC, de PaivaAP, et al., 2017. A review of helical milling process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 120:27-48.

[32]SantiusteC, Rodríguez-MillánM, GinerE, et al., 2014. The influence of anisotropy in numerical modeling of orthogonal cutting of cortical bone. Compos Struct, 116(9):423-431.

[33]ShangZD, LiaoZR, SarasuaJA, et al., 2019. On modelling of laser assisted machining: forward and inverse problems for heat placement control. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 138:36-50.

[34]SuF, HuZH, RongZ, et al., 2020a. New drill-milling tools for novel drill-milling process of carbon fiber-reinforced plastics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 107(1-2):217-228.

[35]SuF, LiCJ, LiWY, et al., 2020b. Cutting forces and correlation with the damages during CFRP drill-milling by using novel drill-milling tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 108(7-8):2661-2674.

[36]SuF, LiWY, JuanC, et al., 2021. Drill-milling process and novel drill-milling tool for making a hole on carbon fiber-reinforced plastics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 115(7-8):2125-2143.

[37]SugitaN, OsaT, MitsuishiM, 2009. Analysis and estimation of cutting-temperature distribution during end milling in relation to orthopedic surgery. Med Eng Phys, 31(1):101-107.

[38]SunL, GaoH, WangB, et al., 2020. Mechanism of reduction of damage during helical milling of titanium/CFRP/aluminium stacks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 107(11-12):4741-4753.

[39]SunXY, McKenzieFD, BawabS, et al., 2011. Automated dental implantation using image-guided robotics: registration results. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, 6(5):627-634.

[40]TaiBL, ZhangLH, WangA, et al., 2013. Neurosurgical bone grinding temperature monitoring. Procedia CIRP, 5:226-230.

[41]TurkiY, HabakM, VelascoR, et al., 2014. Experimental investigation of drilling damage and stitching effects on the mechanical behavior of carbon/epoxy composites. Int J Mach Tools Manuf, 87:61-72.

[42]WangHY, QinXD, LiH, et al., 2013. Analysis of cutting forces in helical milling of carbon fiber-reinforced plastics. Prod Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf, 227(1):62-74.

[43]WangYQ, LiJM, LiuK, et al., 2022. Experiment and numerical study of chip formation mechanism during cryogenic machining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J Manuf Process, 84:1246-1257.

[44]WuHC, ChenXH, KongLH, et al., 2023. Mechanical and biological properties of titanium and its alloys for oral implant with preparation techniques: a review. Materials, 16(21):6860.

[45]YuDD, LiuC, WuYQ, et al., 2020. Measurement and prediction of drilling force in fresh human cadaver mandibles: a pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 22(1):4-12.

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion

<1>

Please provide your name, email address and a comment





Full Text:   <4806>

Summary:  <10>

CLC number: 

On-line Access: 2026-08-13

Received: 2024-11-05

Revision Accepted: 2025-05-18

Crosschecked: 2026-08-13

Cited: 0

Clicked: 3338

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714

 ORCID:

Yun-feng Liu

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8487-0078

Chaofan LI

https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7223-4648

Kangjie CHENG

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2112-0701

Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - 2026 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE