CLC number:
On-line Access: 2024-06-27
Received: 2023-03-06
Revision Accepted: 2023-08-16
Crosschecked: 2024-06-27
Cited: 0
Clicked: 941
Citations: Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714
Liang LU, Zhongdong LIANG, Yuming LIU, Zhipeng WANG, Shohei RYU. Geometrical transition properties of vortex cavitation and associated flow-choking characteristics in poppet valves[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 2024, 25(6): 455-469.
@article{title="Geometrical transition properties of vortex cavitation and associated flow-choking characteristics in poppet valves",
author="Liang LU, Zhongdong LIANG, Yuming LIU, Zhipeng WANG, Shohei RYU",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science A",
volume="25",
number="6",
pages="455-469",
year="2024",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.A2300114"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Geometrical transition properties of vortex cavitation and associated flow-choking characteristics in poppet valves
%A Liang LU
%A Zhongdong LIANG
%A Yuming LIU
%A Zhipeng WANG
%A Shohei RYU
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A
%V 25
%N 6
%P 455-469
%@ 1673-565X
%D 2024
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.A2300114
TY - JOUR
T1 - Geometrical transition properties of vortex cavitation and associated flow-choking characteristics in poppet valves
A1 - Liang LU
A1 - Zhongdong LIANG
A1 - Yuming LIU
A1 - Zhipeng WANG
A1 - Shohei RYU
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science A
VL - 25
IS - 6
SP - 455
EP - 469
%@ 1673-565X
Y1 - 2024
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.A2300114
Abstract: poppet valves have become increasingly significant in ensuring precise digital flow rate and pressure control in hydraulic systems, necessitating a more profound understanding of the geometrical properties of cavitation in them, as well as associated flow-choking conditions. Through a comparative analysis with experimentally observed cavity images, we found that large eddy simulation (LES) turbulence modeling effectively replicates the geometrical properties of cavitation in these valves. The analysis demonstrated that cavitation is generated from vortices that result from the interaction between the notch contracta flow and the surrounding fluid structure. Variations in the internal or external vena contracta conditions result in fixed or discrete cavities, and the length-to-diameter ratio serves as a measure of the transition between internal and external vena contracta flow properties. This study establishes a threshold length-to-diameter ratio of approximately 2 for the tested poppet valves. More specifically, in notch structures with a smaller valve opening, longer sealing length, and smaller throttling angle (corresponding to a larger length-to-diameter ratio), the liquid-to-vapor transfer process is more evident than that in the reverse direction. A long-standing vapor cavity becomes fixed inside the notch, leading to a more pronounced flow-choking phenomenon. In contrast, for structures with a smaller length-to-diameter ratio, the cavitation process for discrete vapor cavities is more complete, ensuring fluid flow continuity and significantly reducing the occurrence of the flow-choking phenomenon.
[1]AltimiraM, FuchsL, 2015. Numerical investigation of throttle flow under cavitating conditions. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 75:124-136.
[2]BrennenCE, 2014. Cavitation and Bubble Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p.10-22.
[3]ChiavolaO, FrattiniE, PalmieriF, et al., 2019. Poppet valve performance under cavitating conditions. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2191(1):020045.
[4]FiloG, LisowskiE, RajdaJ, 2021. Design and flow analysis of an adjustable check valve by means of CFD method. Energies, 14(8):2237.
[5]FinnemoreEJ, FranziniJB, 2002. Fluid Mechanics with Engineering Applications. 10th Edition. McGraw-Hill Education, New York, USA, p.505.
[6]GaoQ, ZhuYC, ChenXM, et al., 2019. CFD simulation on flow field of a large flow rate high speed on/off valve. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Fluid Power and Mechatronics, p.224-230.
[7]GaoQ, ZhuY, LiuJH, 2022. Dynamics modelling and control of a novel fuel metering valve actuated by two binary-coded digital valve arrays. Machines, 10(1):55.
[8]GhosalS, MoinP, 1995. The basic equations for the large eddy simulation of turbulent flows in complex geometry. Journal of Computational Physics, 118(1):24-37.
[9]HanMX, LiuYS, WuDF, et al., 2017. A numerical investigation in characteristics of flow force under cavitation state inside the water hydraulic poppet valves. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 111:1-16.
[10]HaoQH, WuWR, TianGT, 2022. Study on reducing both flow force and cavitation in poppet valves. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 236(23):11160-11179.
[11]HinzeJO, 1975. Turbulence. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
[12]HuoJL, LuanXY, GongYW, et al., 2021. Numerical study of bund overtopping phenomena after a catastrophic tank failure using the axisymmetric approach. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 153:464-471.
[13]IravaniM, ToghraieD, 2020. Design a high-pressure test system to investigate the performance characteristics of ball valves in a compressible choked flow. Measurement, 151:107200.
[14]KumagaiK, RyuS, OtaM, et al., 2016. Investigation of poppet valve vibration with cavitation. International Journal of Fluid Power, 17(1):15-24.
[15]LiBB, ZhaoQ, LiHY, et al., 2021. Analysis method of the cavitation vibration signals in poppet valve based on EEMD. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 13(2):1687814021998114.
[16]LuL, ZouJ, FuX, et al., 2009. Cavitating flow in non-circular opening spool valves with U-grooves. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 223(10):2297-2307.
[17]LuL, XieSH, YinYB, et al., 2020. Experimental and numerical analysis on the surge instability characteristics of the vortex flow produced large vapor cavity in u-shape notch spool valve. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 146:118882.
[18]LuL, XuYP, LiMR, et al., 2022. Analysis of fretting wear behavior of unloading valve of gasoline direct injection high pressure pump. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 23:314-328.
[19]LuL, WangJ, LiMR, et al., 2022. Experimental and numerical analysis on vortex cavitation morphological characteristics in u-shape notch spool valve and the vortex cavitation coupled choked flow conditions. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 189:122707.
[20]ManninenM, TaivassaloV, KallioS, 1996. On the Mixture Model for Multiphase Flow. Technical Report No. VTT-PUB-288, Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland.
[21]MartelliM, GessiS, MassarottiGP, et al., 2017. On peculiar flow characteristics in hydraulic orifices. ASME/BATH Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control, Article V001T001A057.
[22]MinW, WangHY, ZhengZ, et al., 2020. Visual experimental investigation on the stability of pressure regulating poppet valve. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 234(12):2329-2348.
[23]NicoudF, DucrosF, 1999. Subgrid-scale stress modelling based on the square of the velocity gradient tensor. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 62(3):183-200.
[24]NourazarS, SafaviM, 2017. Two-dimensional large-eddy simulation of density-current flow propagating up a slope. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 143(9):04017035.
[25]PanM, PlummerA, 2018. Digital switched hydraulics. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 13(2):225-231.
[26]RoachePJ, 1998. Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering. Hermosa Publishers, Albuquerque, USA.
[27]RoohiE, ZahiriAP, Passandideh-FardM, 2013. Numerical simulation of cavitation around a two-dimensional hydrofoil using VOF method and LES turbulence model. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(9):6469-6488.
[28]SchnerrGH, SauerJ, 2001. Physical and numerical modeling of unsteady cavitation dynamics. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Multiphase flow, p.1-12.
[29]SinghalAK, AthavaleMM, LiHY, et al., 2002. Mathematical basis and validation of the full cavitation model. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 124(3):617-624.
[30]StosiakM, SkačkauskasP, TowarnickiK, et al., 2023. Analysis of the impact of vibrations on a micro-hydraulic valve using a modified induction algorithm. Machines, 11(2):184.
[31]TamburranoP, PlummerAR, DistasoE, et al., 2019. A review of direct drive proportional electrohydraulic spool valves: industrial state-of-the-art and research advancements. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 141(2):020801.
[32]WangS, ZhangB, ZhongQ, et al., 2017. Study on control performance of pilot high-speed switching valve. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 9(7).
[33]YuanC, SongJC, LiuMH, 2019a. Investigation of flow dynamics and governing mechanism of choked flow for cavitating jet in a poppet valve. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 129:113-131.
[34]YuanC, SongJC, ZhuLS, et al., 2019b. Numerical investigation on cavitating jet inside a poppet valve with special emphasis on cavitation-vortex interaction. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 141:1009-1024.
[35]YuanC, ZhuLS, LiuSQ, et al., 2021. Examination of viscosity effect on cavitating flow inside poppet valves based on a numerical study. Applied Sciences, 11(23):11205.
[36]YuanC, ZhuLS, LiuSQ, et al., 2022. Numerical study on the cavitating flow through poppet valves concerning the influence of flow instability on cavitation dynamics. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 36(2):761-773.
[37]ZhangJH, WangD, XuB, et al., 2018. Experimental and numerical investigation of flow forces in a seat valve using a damping sleeve with orifices. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering), 19(6):417-430.
[38]ZwartPJ, GerberAG, BelamriT, 2004. A two-phase flow model for predicting cavitation dynamics. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Multiphase Flow, Article 152.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>