Similar articles

Abstract: Background: Our previous studies revealed cyclicity in the incidence rate of skin malignant melanoma (SMM; ICD9, Dx:172) in the Czech Republic (period T=7.50~7.63 years), UK (T=11.00 years) and Bulgaria (T=12.20 years). Incidences compared with the sunspot index Rz (lag-period dT=+2, +4, +6, +10 or +12 years) have indicated that maximal rates are most likely to appear on descending slopes of the 11-year solar cycle, i.e., out of phase. We summarized and explored more deeply these cyclic variations and discussed their possible associations with heliogeophysical activity (HGA) components exhibiting similar cyclicity. Methods: Annual incidences of SMM from 5 countries (Czech Republic, UK, Bulgaria, USA and Canada) over various time spans during the years 1964~1992 were analyzed and their correlations with cyclic Rz (sunspot number) and aa (planetary geomagnetic activity) indices were summarized. Periodogram regression analysis with trigonometric approximation and phase-correlation analysis were applied. Results: Previous findings on SMM for the Czech Republic, UK and Bulgaria have been validated, and cyclic patterns have been revealed for USA (T=8.63 years, P<0.05) and Canada (Ontario, T=9.91 years, P<0.10). Also, various ‘hypercycles’ were established (T=45.5, 42.0, 48.25, 34.5 and 26.5 years, respectively) describing long-term cyclic incidence patterns. The association of SMM for USA and Canada with Rz (dT=+6 and +7 years, respectively) and aa (dT=−10 and +9 years, respectively) was described. Possible interactions of cyclic non-photic influences (UV irradiation, Schumann resonance signal, low-frequency geomagnetic fluctuations) with brain waves absorbance, neuronal calcium dynamics, neuro-endocrine axis modulation, melatonin/serotonin disbalance and skin neuro-immunity impairment as likely causal pathways in melanoma appearance, were also discussed. Conclusion: The above findings on cyclicity and temporal association of SMM with cyclic environmental factors could not only allow for better forecasting models but also lead to a better understanding of melanoma aetiology.

[1] Cherry, N., 2002. Schumann resonances, a plausible biophysical mechanism for the human effects of solar/geomagnetic activity. Natural Hazards, 26(3):279-331.

[2] Cucinotta, F., Durante, M., 2006. Cancer risk from exposure to galactic cosmic rays: implications for space exploration by human beings. Lancet Oncology, 7(5):431-435.

[3] Dimitrov, B.D., 1993a. Heliophysical activity and incidence variations of skin malignant melanoma in Czechoslovakia: a regional study. International Journal of Biometeorology, 37(2):68-71.

[4] Dimitrov, B.D., 1993b. Influence of Heliogeophysical Activity and Ultraviolet Radiation on the Epidemiology of Malignant Melanoma of the Skin in the North-West Region of England. MSc Thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester.

[5] Dimitrov, B.D., Komitov, B.P., 1995. Epidemiological study on relations of solar activity with incidence variations for malignant melanoma of the skin in Bulgaria. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie Bulgare des Sciences, 48(11-12):35-38.

[6] Dimitrov, B.D., Shangova-Grigoriadi, S., Grigoriadis, E., 1998. Cyclicity in variations of incidence rates for breast cancer in different countries. Folia Medica (Plovdiv), 40(Suppl. 3B):66-71.

[7] Dimitrov, B.D., Atanassova, P.A., Rachkova, M.I., 2007. Brain metastases of melanoma—mechanisms of attack on their defence system by engineered stem cells in the microenvironment. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B, 8(9):609-611.

[8] Encinas, J.M., Vazquez, M.E., Switzer, R.C., Chamberland, D.W., Nick, H., Levine, H.G., Scarpa, P.J., Enikolopov, G., Steindler, D.A., 2008. Quiescent adult neural stem cells are exceptionally sensitive to cosmic radiation. Experimental Neurology, 210(1):274-279.

[9] Ettler, K., 1987. Dependence of the incidence of malignant melanoma on the amount of solar radiation. Cseskoslovenske Dermatologie, 62(6):358-363 (in Czech).

[10] Guering-Galaktionova, I.V., Kupriyanov, S.N., 1971. Do Solar Activity Variations Effect Oncological Morbidity? In: Gnevyshev, M.N., Ohl, A.I. (Eds.), Influence of Solar Activity on Atmosphere and Biosphere of the Earth. Nauka, Moscow, p.198-201 (in Russian).

[11] Halberg, F., Cornélissen, G., Regal, P., Otsuka, K., Wang, Z., Katinas, G.S., Siegelova, J., Homolka, P., Prikryl, P., Chibisov, S.M., et al., 2004. Chronoastrobiology: proposal, nine conferences, heliogeomagnetics, transyears, near-weeks, near-decades, phylogenetic and ontogenetic memories. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 58(Suppl. 1):S150-S187.

[12] Houghton, A., Munster, E.W., Viola, M.V., 1978. Increased incidence of malignant melanoma after peaks of sunspot activity. Lancet, 311(8067):759-760.

[13] Kamide, Y., 2003. What human being cannot see can exist: a message from recent studies of solar-terrestrial relationships. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 57(Suppl. 1):19s-23s.

[14] Kamide, Y., 2005. We reside in the sun’s atmosphere. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 59(Suppl. 1):S1-S4.

[15] Kojo, K., Jansen, C.T., Nybom, P., Huurto, L., Laihia, J., Ilus T., Auvinen, A., 2006. Population exposure to ultraviolet radiation in Finland 1920-1995: Exposure trends and a time-series analysis of exposure and cutaneous melanoma incidence. Environmental Research, 101(1):123-131.

[16] Komitov, B.P., 1986. About the possible effect of solar cycles on the climate in Bulgaria. Solnechnie Dannye, (5):73-78 (in Russian).

[17] Slominski, A., 2005. Neuroendocrine system of the skin. Dermatology, 211(3):199-208.

[18] Srinivasan, V., Spence, D.W., Pandi-Perumal, S.R., Trakht, I., Esquifino, A.I., Cardinali, D.P., Maestroni, G.J., 2008. Melatonin, environmental light, and breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 108(3):339-350.

[19] Valev, D.M., 1986. Relationship between the atmospheric pressure in the time of the warm half-year in Sofia and Hale’s solar cycle. Solnechnie Dannye, (3):75-79 (in Russian).

[20] Wigle, D.T., 1978. Malignant melanoma of skin and sunspot activity. Lancet, 312(8079):38.