Full Text:   <3862>

CLC number: R969.1

On-line Access: 2024-08-27

Received: 2023-10-17

Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08

Crosschecked: 2012-04-06

Cited: 5

Clicked: 6915

Citations:  Bibtex RefMan EndNote GB/T7714

-   Go to

Article info.
Open peer comments

Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B 2012 Vol.13 No.5 P.348-355

http://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1100272


Relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic comparison of two different enteric formulations of omeprazole


Author(s):  Jian Liu, Jian-zhong Shentu, Li-hua Wu, Jing Dou, Qi-yang Xu, Hui-li Zhou, Guo-lan Wu, Ming-zhu Huang, Xing-jiang Hu, Jun-chun Chen

Affiliation(s):  State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Infectious Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China; more

Corresponding email(s):   stjz@zju.edu.cn

Key Words:  Omeprazole, 5-Hydroxyomeprazole, Omeprazole sulfone, Bioavailability, Pharmacokinetics, Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)


Jian Liu, Jian-zhong Shentu, Li-hua Wu, Jing Dou, Qi-yang Xu, Hui-li Zhou, Guo-lan Wu, Ming-zhu Huang, Xing-jiang Hu, Jun-chun Chen. Relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic comparison of two different enteric formulations of omeprazole[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2012, 13(5): 348-355.

@article{title="Relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic comparison of two different enteric formulations of omeprazole",
author="Jian Liu, Jian-zhong Shentu, Li-hua Wu, Jing Dou, Qi-yang Xu, Hui-li Zhou, Guo-lan Wu, Ming-zhu Huang, Xing-jiang Hu, Jun-chun Chen",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
volume="13",
number="5",
pages="348-355",
year="2012",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.B1100272"
}

%0 Journal Article
%T Relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic comparison of two different enteric formulations of omeprazole
%A Jian Liu
%A Jian-zhong Shentu
%A Li-hua Wu
%A Jing Dou
%A Qi-yang Xu
%A Hui-li Zhou
%A Guo-lan Wu
%A Ming-zhu Huang
%A Xing-jiang Hu
%A Jun-chun Chen
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 13
%N 5
%P 348-355
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2012
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.B1100272

TY - JOUR
T1 - Relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic comparison of two different enteric formulations of omeprazole
A1 - Jian Liu
A1 - Jian-zhong Shentu
A1 - Li-hua Wu
A1 - Jing Dou
A1 - Qi-yang Xu
A1 - Hui-li Zhou
A1 - Guo-lan Wu
A1 - Ming-zhu Huang
A1 - Xing-jiang Hu
A1 - Jun-chun Chen
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 13
IS - 5
SP - 348
EP - 355
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2012
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.B1100272


Abstract: 
In order to comply with the requirements for a drug listed in China, the study was developed to compare the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of two different enteric formulations of omeprazole (OPZ) in healthy Chinese subjects. A total of 32 volunteers participated in the study. Plasma concentrations were analyzed by nonstereospecific liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) method. After administration of a single 40-mg dose of the two OPZ formulations, the comparative bioavailability was assessed by calculating individual AUC0‒t (the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration), AUC0‒∞ (the area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity), Cmax (the maximum observed concentration), and Tpeak (the time to Cmax) values of OPZ, 5-hydroxyomeprazole (OH-OPZ), and omeprazole sulfone (OPZ-SFN), respectively. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of AUC0‒t, AUC0‒∞, and Cmax were 85.4%‒99.0%/88.8%‒98.6%/87.6%‒99.4%, 85.5%‒99.2%/89.0%‒98.6%/88.5%‒101.3%, and 72.3%‒87.6%/79.6%‒91.1%/88.4%‒99.1% for OPZ/OH-OPZ/OPZ-SFN, respectively, and Tpeak values did not differ significantly. In this study, the test formulation of OPZ in fasting healthy Chinese male volunteers met the Chinese bioequivalance standard to the reference formulation based on AUC, Cmax, and Tpeak.

Darkslateblue:Affiliate; Royal Blue:Author; Turquoise:Article

Reference

[1]Allegrini, A., Nuzzo, L., Scaringi, A.T., Felaco, S., Pavone, D., Toniato, E., Mezzetti, A., Martinotti, S., Lenotti, G., 2008. Bioequivalence study of two capsule formulations of omeprazole in healthy volunteers. Arzneimittelforschung, 58(8):385-388.

[2]Andersson, T., Regårdh, C.G., Lou, Y.C., Zhang, Y., Dahl, M.L., Bertilsson, L., 1992. Polymorphic hydroxylation of S-mephenytoin and omeprazole metabolism in Caucasian and Chinese subjects. Pharmacogenetics, 2(1):25-31.

[3]Andersson, T., Miners, J.O., Veronese, M.E., Birkett, D.J., 1994. Identification of human liver cytochrome P450 isoforms mediating secondary omeprazole metabolism. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 37(6):597-604.

[4]Bertilsson, L., Lou, Y.Q., Du, Y.L., Liu, Y., Kuang, T.Y., Liao, X.M., Wang, K.Y., Reviriego, J., Iselius, L., Sjöqvist, F., 1992. Pronounced differences between native Chinese and Swedish populations in the polymorphic hydroxylations of debrisoquin and S-mephenytoin. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 51(4):388-397.

[5]Blum, R.A., 1996. Lansoprazole and omeprazole in the treatment of acid peptic disorders. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., 53(12):1401-1415.

[6]Bolton, S., 1997. Pharmaceutical Statistics: Practical and Clinical Applications, 3rd Ed. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA, p.210-212, 405-418.

[7]Hu, X.P., Xu, J.M., Hu, Y.M., Mei, Q., Xu, X.H., 2007. Effects of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of omeprazole in Chinese people. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther., 32(5):517-524.

[8]Joti, J.J., Nahar, K., Hasan, A., Azad, M.A., Ullah, M.A., Islam, S.M., Hasnat, A., 2009. Bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic study of two different omeprazole capsule formulations in healthy Bangladeshi volunteers. Arzneimittelforschung, 59(4):171-175.

[9]Kanazawa, H., Okada, A., Higaki, M., Yokota, H., Mashige, F., Nakahara, K., 2003. Stereospecific analysis of omeprazole in human plasma as a probe for CYP2C19 phenotype. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 30(6):1817-1824.

[10]Poo, J.L., Galán, J.F., Rosete, A., de Lago, A., Oliva, I., González-de la Parra, M., Jiménez, P., Burke-Fraga, V., Namur, S., 2008. Bioavailability of two single-dose oral formulations of omeprazole 20 mg: an open-label, randomized sequence, two-period crossover comparison in healthy Mexican adult volunteers. Clin. Ther., 30(4):693-699.

[11]Rambla-Alegre, M., Esteve-Romero, J., Carda-Broch, S., 2009. Analysis of omeprazole and its main metabolites by liquid chromatography using hybrid micellar mobile phases. Anal. Chim. Acta, 633(2):250-256.

[12]Rezk, N.L., Brown, K.C., Kashuba, A.D., 2006. A simple and sensitive bioanalytical assay for simultaneous determination of omeprazole and its three major metabolites in human blood plasma using RP-HPLC after a simple liquid-liquid extraction procedure. J. Chromatogr. B, 844(2):314-321.

[13]Rhim, S.Y., Park, J.H., Park, Y.S., Lee, M.H., Hwang, K.G., Kim, Y.S., Shaw, L.M., Lee, Y.S., Kang, J.S., 2009. Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of 20 mg omeprazole capsule in 24 healthy Korean male volunteers. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 47(1):23-29.

[14]Sachs, G., Shin, J.M., Howden, C.W., 2006. Review article: the clinical pharmacology of proton pump inhibitors. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther., 23 (S2):2-8.

[15]SFDA (State Food and Drug Administration of China), 2003. Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (in Chinese). Available from http://www.sda.gov.cn/WS01/CL0053/ 24473.html [Accessed on Feb. 10, 2009].

[16]SFDA (State Food and Drug Administration of China), 2005. Guideline for Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies of Generic Drug Products (in Chinese). Available from http://www.cde.org.cn/zdyz.do?method=largePage&id=2066 [Accessed on Feb. 10, 2009].

Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion

<1>

Please provide your name, email address and a comment





Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
Tel: +86-571-87952783; E-mail: cjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE