Similar articles

Abstract: distance effect has been regarded as the best established marker of basic numerical magnitude processes and is related to individual mathematical abilities. A larger behavioral distance effect is suggested to be concomitant with lower mathematical achievement in children. However, the relationship between distance effect and superior mathematical abilities is unclear. One could get superior mathematical abilities by acquiring the skill of abacus-based mental calculation (AMC), which can be used to solve calculation problems with exceptional speed and high accuracy. In the current study, we explore the relationship between distance effect and superior mathematical abilities by examining whether and how the AMC training modifies numerical magnitude processing. Thus, mathematical competencies were tested in 18 abacus-trained children (who accepted the AMC training) and 18 non-trained children. electroencephalography (EEG) waveforms were recorded when these children executed numerical comparison tasks in both Arabic digit and dot array forms. We found that: (a) the abacus-trained group had superior mathematical abilities than their peers; (b) distance effects were found both in behavioral results and on EEG waveforms; (c) the distance effect size of the average amplitude on the late negative-going component was different between groups in the digit task, with a larger effect size for abacus-trained children; (d) both the behavioral and EEG distance effects were modulated by the notation. These results revealed that the neural substrates of magnitude processing were modified by AMC training, and suggested that the mechanism of the representation of numerical magnitude for children with superior mathematical abilities was different from their peers. In addition, the results provide evidence for a view of non-abstract numerical representation.

高数学能力珠心算儿童数量表征的脑电研究

[1]Ansari, D., Karmiloff-Smith, A., 2002. Atypical trajectories of number development: a neuroconstructivist perspective. Trends Cogn. Sci., 6(12):511-516.

[2]Ansari, D., Garcia, N., Lucas, E., et al., 2005. Neural correlates of symbolic number processing in children and adults. Neuroreport, 16(16):1769-1773.

[3]Butterworth, B., 2005. The development of arithmetical abilities. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry, 46(1):3-18.

[4]Chen, F., Hu, Z., Zhao, X., et al., 2006. Neural correlates of serial abacus mental calculation in children: a functional MRI study. Neurosci. Lett., 403(1-2):46-51.

[5]Cohen Kadosh, R., Walsh, V., 2009. Numerical representation in the parietal lobes: abstract or not abstract? Behav. Brain Sci., 32(3-4):313-328.

[6]Cohen Kadosh, R., Cohen Kadosh, K., Kaas, A., et al., 2007. Notation-dependent and -independent representations of numbers in the parietal lobes. Neuron, 53(2):307-314.

[7]Dehaene, S., 1996. The organization of brain activations in number comparison: event-related potentials and the additive-factors method. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 8(1):47-68.

[8]Dehaene, S., Akhavein, R., 1995. Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 21(2):314.

[9]Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., Mehler, J., 1990. Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 16(3):626.

[10]Dehaene, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Cohen, L., 1998. Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain. Trends Neurosci., 21(8):355-361.

[11]Dehaene, S., Molko, N., Cohen, L., et al., 2004. Arithmetic and the brain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 14(2):218-224.

[12]de Smedt, B., Verschaffel, L., Ghesquière, P., 2009. The predictive value of numerical magnitude comparison for individual differences in mathematics achievement. J. Exp. Child Psychol., 103(4):469-479.

[13]Du, F., Chen, F., Li, Y., et al., 2013. Abacus training modulates the neural correlates of exact and approximate calculations in Chinese children: an fMRI study. BioMed Res. Int., 2013:694075.

[14]Frank, M.C., Barner, D., 2012. Representing exact number visually using mental abacus. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 141(1):134-139.

[15]Furman, T., Rubinsten, O., 2012. Symbolic and non symbolic numerical representation in adults with and without developmental dyscalculia. Behav. Brain Funct., 8(1):55.

[16]Ganor-Stern, D., Tzelgov, J., 2008. Across-notation automatic numerical processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn., 34(2):430.

[17]Grune, K., Mecklinger, A., Ullsperger, P., 1993. Mental comparison: P300 component of the ERP reflects the symbolic distance effect. Neuroreport, 4(11):1272-1274.

[18]Haffner, J., Baro, K., Langner, C., et al., 2005. HRT 1-4: Heidelberger Rechentest: Erfassung Mathematischer Basiskompetenzen im Grundschulalter. Hogrefe, Gottingen (in German).

[19]Hanakawa, T., Honda, M., Okada, T., et al., 2003. Neural correlates underlying mental calculation in abacus experts: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroimage, 19(2):296-307.

[20]Hatano, G., 1988. Social and motivational bases for mathematical understanding. NDCAD, 1988(41):55-70.

[21]Hatano, G., Miyake, Y., Binks, M.G., 1977. Performance of expert abacus operators. Cognition, 5(1):47-55.

[22]Heine, A., Wißmann, J., Tamm, S., et al., 2013. An electrophysiological investigation of non-symbolic magnitude processing: numerical distance effects in children with and without mathematical learning disabilities. Cortex, 49(8):2162-2177.

[23]Henik, A., Tzelgov, J., 1982. Is three greater than five: the relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks. Mem. Cognit., 10(4):389-395.

[24]Holloway, I.D., Ansari, D., 2009. Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children’s mathematics achievement. J. Exp. Child Psychol., 103(1):17-29.

[25]Jiang, T., Qiao, S., Li, J., et al., 2010. Effects of symbol type and numerical distance on the human event-related potential. Neuropsychologia, 48(1):201-210.

[26]Landerl, K., Bevan, A., Butterworth, B., 2004. Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: a study of 8–9-year-old students. Cognition, 93(2):99-125.

[27]Libertus, M.E., Woldorff, M.G., Brannon, E.M., 2007. Electrophysiological evidence for notation independence in numerical processing. Behav. Brain Funct., 3(1):1-15.

[28]Mccloskey, M., 1992. Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: evidence from acquired dyscalculia. Cognition, 44(1-2):107-157.

[29]Moyer, R.S., Landauer, T.K., 1967. Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature, 215(5109):1519-1520.

[30]Mussolin, C., de Volder, A., Grandin, C., et al., 2010a. Neural correlates of symbolic number comparison in developmental dyscalculia. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 22(5):860-874.

[31]Mussolin, C., Mejias, S., Noël, M.P., 2010b. Symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison in children with and without dyscalculia. Cognition, 115(1):10-25.

[32]Naccache, L., Dehaene, S., 2001. Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli. Cognition, 80(3):215-229.

[33]Paulsen, D.J., Neville, H.J., 2008. The processing of non-symbolic numerical magnitudes as indexed by ERPs. Neuropsychologia, 46(10):2532-2544.

[34]Picton, T.W., 1992. The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J. Clin. Neurophysiol., 9(4):456-479.

[35]Pinel, P., Dehaene, S., Riviere, D., et al., 2001. Modulation of parietal activation by semantic distance in a number comparison task. Neuroimage, 14(5):1013-1026.

[36]Price, G.R., Holloway, I., Räsänen, P., et al., 2007. Impaired parietal magnitude processing in developmental dyscalculia. Curr. Biol., 17(24):R1042-R1043.

[37]Reeve, R., Reynolds, F., Humberstone, J., et al., 2012. Stability and change in markers of core numerical competencies. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 141(4):649.

[38]Rumelhart, D.E., Mcclelland, J.L., Group, P.R., 1986. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. 1: Foundations. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, p.560-567.

[39]Schwarz, W., Heinze, H.J., 1998. On the interaction of numerical and size information in digit comparison: a behavioral and event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 36(11):1167-1179.

[40]Schwarz, W., Ischebeck, A., 2000. Sequential effects in number comparison. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 26(5):1606.

[41]Soltész, F., Szűcs, D., Dékány, J., et al., 2007. A combined event-related potential and neuropsychological investigation of developmental dyscalculia. Neurosci. Lett., 417(2):181-186.

[42]Soltész, F., Goswami, U., White, S., et al., 2011. Executive function effects and numerical development in children: behavioural and ERP evidence from a numerical stroop paradigm. Learn. Individ. Differ., 21(6):662-671.

[43]Szũcs, D., Soltész, F., Jármi, E., et al., 2007. The speed of magnitude processing and executive functions in controlled and automatic number comparison in children: an electro-encephalography study. Behav. Brain Funct., 3(1):23.

[44]Temple, E., Posner, M.I., 1998. Brain mechanisms of quantity are similar in 5-year-old children and adults. PNAS, 95(13):7836-7841.

[45]Turconi, E., Jemel, B., Rossion, B., et al., 2004. Electrophysiological evidence for differential processing of numerical quantity and order in humans. Cogn. Brain Res., 21(1):22-38.

[46]Wang, Y., Geng, F., Hu, Y., et al., 2013. Numerical processing efficiency improved in experienced mental abacus children. Cognition, 127(2):149-158.

[47]Wu, H.R., Li, L., 2006. Norm establishment for Chinese rating scale of pupil’s mathematics abilities. J. Clin. Rehab. Tissue Eng. Res., 10(30):168-171 (in Chinese).

[48]Zhang, H., Wang, X., 1985. The Chinese Version of the Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices. Beijing Nor. Univ., Beijing, China (in Chinese).