CLC number: S816.2
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2018-05-18
Cited: 0
Clicked: 3950
Chao-hua Tang, Jia Liu, Qing-yu Zhao, Jun-min Zhang. Pharmacokinetic comparison of gossypol isomers in cattle: transfer from diet to plasma and degradation by rumen microbes[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2018, 19(6): 471-480.
@article{title="Pharmacokinetic comparison of gossypol isomers in cattle: transfer from diet to plasma and degradation by rumen microbes",
author="Chao-hua Tang, Jia Liu, Qing-yu Zhao, Jun-min Zhang",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
volume="19",
number="6",
pages="471-480",
year="2018",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.B1700289"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Pharmacokinetic comparison of gossypol isomers in cattle: transfer from diet to plasma and degradation by rumen microbes
%A Chao-hua Tang
%A Jia Liu
%A Qing-yu Zhao
%A Jun-min Zhang
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 19
%N 6
%P 471-480
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2018
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.B1700289
TY - JOUR
T1 - Pharmacokinetic comparison of gossypol isomers in cattle: transfer from diet to plasma and degradation by rumen microbes
A1 - Chao-hua Tang
A1 - Jia Liu
A1 - Qing-yu Zhao
A1 - Jun-min Zhang
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 19
IS - 6
SP - 471
EP - 480
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2018
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.B1700289
Abstract: A pharmacokinetic comparison of gossypol isomers in cattle was made by investigating their transfer from ingested food to plasma and their degradation by rumen microbes. The gossypol isomers in whole cottonseed, plasma, and rumen fluid were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The intakes of (+)- and (−)-gossypol by cows on three farms were about 5.6–8.5 and 3.8–5.9 g/(d·herd), respectively. The plasma gossypol concentrations increased as ingestion increased and ranged from 0.31 to 0.48 μg/ml for the (+) form and from 0.39 to 0.59 μg/ml for the (−) form. The (+) form was slightly predominant (58.8%–59.8%) in the gossypol ingested by the cows, whereas the (−) form predominated (54.6%–55.9%) in the plasma. An in vitro study showed that at 6 h, 67.4% and 85.7% of the (−)-gossypol were degraded in 500 and 1000 μg/g treatment groups, respectively, and these increased to 83.6% and 92.5%, respectively, at 12 h. The regularity of the degradation of (+)-gossypol was similar to that of (−)-gossypol. These results showed that (−)-gossypol may be more persistent than (+)-gossypol in plasma, and that the degradation of the gossypol isomers in the rumen is rapid and not enantioselective in cattle.
[1]Abou-Donia MB, 1976. Physiological effects and metabolism of gossypol. In: Gunther FA, Gunther JD (Eds.), Residue Reviews, Vol. 61. Springer, New York, p.125-160.
[2]Alexander J, Andersson HC, Bernhoft A, et al., 2008. Gossypol as undesirable substance in animal feed: scientific opinion of the panel on contaminants in the food chain. EFSA J, 6(9):1-55.
[3]AOCS (American Oil Chemists Society), 2009. Recommended Practice Ba 8a-99: Determination of (+)-, (−)-, and Total Gossypol in Cottonseed, Cottonseed Meats, and Meal by HPLC. https://www.aocs.org/attain-lab-services/methods/methods/method-detail?productId=118850 [Accessed on June 1, 2017].
[4]Bullock SL, Hewitt DG, Stanko RL, et al., 2010. Plasma gossypol dynamics in white-tailed deer: implications for whole cottonseed as a supplemental feed. Small Rumin Res, 93(2-3):165-170.
[5]Calhoun MC, 2011. Cottonseed Meal and Whole Cottonseed: Optimizing Their Use in Dairy Cattle Rations. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University System, San Angelo, Texas. http://cottonseed.org/publications/Cottonseed%20Meal%20and%20Whole%20Cottonseed.pdf [Accessed on June 1, 2017].
[6]Cass QB, Bassi AL, Matlin SA, 1999. First direct resolution of gossypol enantiomers on a chiral high-performance liquid chromatography phase. Chirality, 11(1):46-49.
[7]Cass QB, Oliveira RV, de Pietro AV, 2004. Determination of gossypol enantiomer ratio in cotton plants by chiral higher-performance liquid chromatography. J Agric Food Chem, 52(19):5822-5827.
[8]Chen QQ, Chen H, Lei HP, 1987. Comparative study on the metabolism of optical gossypol in rats. J Ethnopharmacol, 20(1):31-37.
[9]Feng Y, Wang Y, 2011. The nutrition value and metabolism of cottonseed in ruminants. Feed Res, 4:13-16 (in Chinese).
[10]Gamboa DA, Calhoun MC, Kuhlmann SW, et al., 2001. Tissue distribution of gossypol enantiomers in broilers fed various cottonseed meals. Poult Sci, 80(7):920-925.
[11]He XW, 2013. Quantitative Analysis Method of Gossypol Enantiomers and Research of Their Metabolic in Rats. MS Thesis, Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
[12]Hron R, Kim H, Calhoun M, et al., 1999. Determination of (+)-, (−)-, and total gossypol in cottonseed by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Am Oil Chem Soc, 76(11):1351-1355.
[13]Jia L, Coward LC, Kerstner-Wood CD, et al., 2008. Comparison of pharmacokinetic and metabolic profiling among gossypol, apogossypol and apogossypol hexaacetate. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 61(1):63-73.
[14]Lin YC, Nuber DC, Gu Y, et al., 1991. Gossypol pharmacokinetics in mid-lactation Brown Swiss dairy cows. Vet Res Commun, 15(5):379-385.
[15]Lordelo MM, Davis AJ, Calhoun MC, et al., 2005. Relative toxicity of gossypol enantiomers in broilers. Poult Sci, 84(9):1376-1382.
[16]Mena H, Santos JEP, Huber JT, et al., 2001. The effects of feeding varying amounts of gossypol from whole cottonseed and cottonseed meal in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 84(10):2231-2239.
[17]Mena H, Santos JEP, Huber JT, et al., 2004. The effects of varying gossypol intake from whole cottonseed and cottonseed meal on lactation and blood parameters in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 87(8):2506-2518.
[18]Menke KH, Steingass H, 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Dev, 28(1):7-55.
[19]Noftsger SM, Hopkins BA, Diaz DE, et al., 2000. Effect of whole and expanded-expelled cottonseed on milk yield and blood gossypol. J Dairy Sci, 83(11):2539-2547.
[20]Reiser R, Fu HC, 1962. The mechanism of gossypol detoxification by ruminant animals. J Nutr, 76(2):215-218.
[21]Santos JEP, Villaseňor M, de Peters EJ, et al., 2002. Type of cottonseed and level of gossypol in diets of lactating dairy cows: effects on lactation performance and plasma gossypol. J Dairy Sci, 85(6):1491-1501.
[22]Santos JEP, Villaseňor M, Robinson PH, et al., 2003. Type of cottonseed and level of gossypol in diets of lactating dairy cows: plasma gossypol, health, and reproductive performance. J Dairy Sci, 86(3):892-905.
[23]Santos JEP, Mena H, Huber JT, et al., 2005. Effects of source of gossypol and supplemental iron on plasma gossypol in Holstein steers. J Dairy Sci, 88(10):3563-3574.
[24]Schneider IC, Ames ML, Rasmussen MA, et al., 2002. Fermentation of cottonseed and other feedstuffs in cattle rumen fluid. J Agric Food Chem, 50(8):2267-2273.
[25]Stipanovic RD, Puckhaber LS, Bell AA, et al., 2005. Occurrence of (+)- and (−)-gossypol in wild species of cotton and in Gossypium hirsutum var. marie-galante (Watt) Hutchinson. J Agric Food Chem, 53(16):6266-6271.
[26]Wang JM, Tao L, Wu XL, et al., 1992. Differential binding of (+) and (−) gossypol to plasma protein and their entry into rat testis. J Reprod Fertil, 95(1):277-282.
[27]Wang S, Tang L,Wang Y, 2012. RP-HPLC chiral separation of gossypol acetic acid. J Guangdong Pharm Univ, 28(4):406-409 (in Chinese).
[28]Wang X, Howell CP, Chen F, et al., 2009. Gossypol—a polyphenolic compound from cotton plant. Adv Food Nutr Res, 58:215-263.
[29]Wu D, 1989. An overview of the clinical pharmacology and therapeutic potential of gossypol as a male contraceptive agent and in gynaecological disease. Drugs, 38(3):333-341.
[30]List of electronic supplementary materials
[31]Table S1 Regular diets fed on the respective farms, as well as the average daily feed intake and the respective average daily milk yield (mean±SE, n=10)
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>