
Guanlei XU, Xiaogang XU, Xun WANG. Expected graph Hilbert transform for time–frequency analysis of uncertain graph topologies[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science C, 2026, 27(9): 1-13.
@article{title="Expected graph Hilbert transform for time–frequency analysis of uncertain graph topologies",
author="Guanlei XU, Xiaogang XU, Xun WANG",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science C",
volume="27",
number="9",
pages="1-13",
year="2026",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/ENG.ITEE.2026.0142"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Expected graph Hilbert transform for time–frequency analysis of uncertain graph topologies
%A Guanlei XU
%A Xiaogang XU
%A Xun WANG
%J Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
%V 27
%N 9
%P 1-13
%@ 1869-1951
%D 2026
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/ENG.ITEE.2026.0142
TY - JOUR
T1 - Expected graph Hilbert transform for time–frequency analysis of uncertain graph topologies
A1 - Guanlei XU
A1 - Xiaogang XU
A1 - Xun WANG
J0 - Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering
VL - 27
IS - 9
SP - 1
EP - 13
%@ 1869-1951
Y1 - 2026
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/ENG.ITEE.2026.0142
Abstract: We propose the expected graph Hilbert transform (EGHT), a robust extension of the Hilbert transform, for graph signals under topological uncertainty. By modeling the shift operator as a random variable and using its expected value as a stable spectral reference, the EGHT applies a π/2 phase shift to non-direct current (DC) graph Fourier modes, enabling the construction of analytic signals on uncertain graphs. The definitions of EGHT for undirected and directed graph ensembles are given, along with key properties such as linearity, anti-involution, and orthogonality; moreover, the expected graph analytic signal (EGAS) for node-wise modulation analysis is introduced. Experiments show that the EGHT outperforms conventional graph Hilbert transforms (GHTs) on noisy realizations, recovering coherent oscillations, producing smooth phase fields, and resisting topological perturbations. As such, it enables reliable time–frequency analysis in stochastic networks.
[1]Chamon LFO, Ribeiro A, 2018. Greedy sampling of graph signals. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 66(1):34-47.
[2]Chen S, Liu JY, Shen L, 2024. A survey on graph neural network acceleration: a hardware perspective. Chin J Electron, 33(3):601-622.
[3]Cohen L, 1995. Time–Frequency Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, USA.
[4]Dai SG, Xu JW, Chen J, et al., 2025. FEGNN: graph neural network with feature embedding for automatic modulation classification. Chin J Electron, 34(6):1746-1756.
[5]Elmoataz A, Lezoray O, Bougleux S, 2008. Nonlocal discrete regularization on weighted graphs: a framework for image and manifold processing. IEEE Trans Image Process, 17(7):1047-1060.
[6]Gabor D, 1946. Theory of communication. Part 1: the Analysis of Information. J Inst Electr Eng Part III Radio Commun Eng, 93(26):429-441.
[7]Girault B, Gonçalves P, Fleury É, 2015. Translation on graphs: an isometric shift operator. IEEE Signal Process Lett, 22(12):2416-2420.
[8]Gu JH, Feng JH, Xu HY, et al., 2025. Directed graph and convolutional network reinforcement learning for terminal-side collaborative computing resource allocation scheme. Acta Electron Sin, 53(6):1771-1783 (in Chinese).
[9]Hou SK, Liu QR, Zhang WB, et al., 2026. FTHOE: a Hamiltonian-driven fault-tolerant routing algorithm for wafer-scale interconnection networks. ENGINEERING Inform Technol Electron Eng, 27(3):250005.
[10]Hu BH, Zhang JP, Chen HC, 2024. Knowledge graph completion method of combining structural information with semantic information. Chin J Electron, 33(6):1412-1420.
[11]Isufi E, Loukas A, Simonetto A, et al., 2017a. Autoregressive moving average graph filtering. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 65(2):274-288.
[12]Isufi E, Loukas A, Simonetto A, et al., 2017b. Filtering random graph processes over random time-varying graphs. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 65(16):4406-4421.
[13]Isufi E, Gama F, Shuman DI, et al., 2024. Graph filters for signal processing and machine learning on graphs. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 72:4745-4781.
[14]Ji F, Tay WP, Ortega A, 2023. Graph signal processing over a probability space of shift operators. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 71:1159-1174.
[15]Jiang W, Guan MY, Wei FP, et al., 2025. Enhanced spatial-temporal graph convolutional network for skeleton-based action recognition. Acta Electron Sin, 53(10):3692-3704 (in Chinese).
[16]Li XG, Cai YJ, Cui W, et al., 2025. A hybrid quantum-graph neural network for multimodal sentiment analysis. Acta Electron Sin, 53(11):3983-3995 (in Chinese).
[17]Liu ZH, Zhang JY, Zhu YY, et al., 2025. Robust multidimensional graph neural networks for signal processing in wireless communications with edge-graph information bottleneck. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 73:2688-2703.
[18]Lyu Y, Qin XT, Du XL, et al., 2025. Multi-path reasoning for multi-hop question answering over knowledge graph. Chin J Electron, 34(2):642-648.
[19]Mei J, Moura JMF, 2017. Signal processing on graphs: causal modeling of unstructured data. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 65(8):2077-2092.
[20]Parada-Mayorga A, Ribeiro A, 2025. Sampling and uniqueness sets in graphon signal processing. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 73:2480-2495.
[21]Perraudin N, Vandergheynst P, 2017. Stationary signal processing on graphs. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 65(13):3462-3477.
[22]Sandryhaila A, Moura JMF, 2014. Analytic signals on graphs. IEEE Int Conf on Acoustics Speech Signal Processing, p.8325-8329.
[23]Sun TJ, Xu HR, Ren SS, et al., 2026. An attention mechanism-based multi-domain feature fusion approach for active sonar target recognition. ENGINEERING Inform Technol Electron Eng, 27(2):250177.
[24]Venkitaraman A, Chatterjee S, Händel P, 2019. On Hilbert transform, analytic signal, and modulation analysis for signals over graphs. Signal Process, 156:106-115.
[25]Wang TT, Guo HY, Lyu B, et al., 2020. Speech signal processing on graphs: graph topology, graph frequency analysis and denoising. Chin J Electron, 29(5):926-936.
[26]Wang YH, Liu ZT, Li R, et al., 2026. Efficient demixing of multiplex graph signals: a convex-concave optimization approach. Signal Process, 246:110612.
[27]Zhang SM, Zheng SY, Huang DG, et al., 2025. Enhancing entity relationship extraction in dialogue texts using hypergraph and heterogeneous graph. Chin J Electron, 34(1):295-308.
[28]Zhou WW, Xue W, Li DX, et al., 2026. A generalized recursive mixed-norm algorithm for graph signal processing with application to online climate data estimation. Signal Process, 245:110565.
CLC number: TN911.72
On-line Access: 2026-10-13
Received: 2026-05-20
Revision Accepted: 2026-07-17
Crosschecked: 2026-10-13
Cited: 0
Clicked: 51
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>