Full Text:
<2138>
CLC number: R737.33
On-line Access: 2024-08-27
Received: 2023-10-17
Revision Accepted: 2024-05-08
Crosschecked: 2017-07-19
Cited: 0
Clicked: 4193
Authors’ response to the comment on “Antepartum hemorrhage from previous-cesarean-sectioned uterus as a potential sign of uterine artery pseudoaneurysm”
| ||||||||||||||
Ning Zhang, Wen Di. Authors’ response to the comment on “Antepartum hemorrhage from previous-cesarean-sectioned uterus as a potential sign of uterine artery pseudoaneurysm”[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 2017, 18(8): 725-726.
@article{title="Authors’ response to the comment on “Antepartum hemorrhage from previous-cesarean-sectioned uterus as a potential sign of uterine artery pseudoaneurysm”",
author="Ning Zhang, Wen Di",
journal="Journal of Zhejiang University Science B",
volume="18",
number="8",
pages="725-726",
year="2017",
publisher="Zhejiang University Press & Springer",
doi="10.1631/jzus.B17r0241"
}
%0 Journal Article
%T Authors’ response to the comment on “Antepartum hemorrhage from previous-cesarean-sectioned uterus as a potential sign of uterine artery pseudoaneurysm”
%A Ning Zhang
%A Wen Di
%J Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B
%V 18
%N 8
%P 725-726
%@ 1673-1581
%D 2017
%I Zhejiang University Press & Springer
%DOI 10.1631/jzus.B17r0241
TY - JOUR
T1 - Authors’ response to the comment on “Antepartum hemorrhage from previous-cesarean-sectioned uterus as a potential sign of uterine artery pseudoaneurysm”
A1 - Ning Zhang
A1 - Wen Di
J0 - Journal of Zhejiang University Science B
VL - 18
IS - 8
SP - 725
EP - 726
%@ 1673-1581
Y1 - 2017
PB - Zhejiang University Press & Springer
ER -
DOI - 10.1631/jzus.B17r0241
Abstract: Thanks for the good comment by Matsubara et al. (2017) on our case of “antepartum hemorrhage from previous-cesarean-sectioned uterus as a potential sign of uterine artery pseudoaneurysm” (Zhang et al., 2017), published in the Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology). In the comment, the authors clarified two possibilities of our scenario: the uterine artery pseudoaneurysm (UAP) could be newly formed in the present delivery as a result of vulnerability of uterine artery and/or its branches at the site of previous cesarean section (CS) scar to exogeneous stimuli during labor contractions; the other possibility is that previous CS caused UAP formation but remained unruptured, and UAP continued to be intrauterine, a hyper-dynamic state during labor causing UAP-sac rupture and resultant antepartum hemorrhage, as well as postpartum hemorrhage.
[1]Baba, Y., Takahashi, H., Ohkuchi, A., et al., 2016. Uterine artery pseudoaneurysm: its occurrence after non-traumatic events, and possibility of “without embolization” strategy. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 205:72-78.
[2]Cornette, J., van der Wilk, E., Janssen, N.M., et al., 2014. Uterine artery pseudoaneurysm requiring embolization during pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol., 123(2 Pt 2):453-456.
[3]Matsubara, S., Takahashi, H., Matsubara, D., et al., 2017. Delivery or previous cesarean? A comment on “Antepartum hemorrhage from previous-cesarean-sectioned uterus as a potential sign of uterine artery pseudoaneurysm”. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. B (Biomed. & Biotechnol.), 18(8):723-724.
[4]Papadakos, N., Wales, L., Hayes, K., et al., 2008. Post-traumatic pelvic pseudoaneurysm and arterio-venous fistula: combined endovascular and surgical approach. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg., 36(2):164-166.
[5]Zhang, N., Lou, W.H., Zhang, X.B., et al., 2017. Antepartum hemorrhage from previous-cesarean-sectioned uterus as a potential sign of uterine artery pseudoaneurysm. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. B (Biomed. & Biotechnol.), 18(5):441-444.
Open peer comments: Debate/Discuss/Question/Opinion
<1>