[1]AdjabiI, OuahabiA, BenzaouiA, et al., 2020. Past, present, and future of face recognition: a review. Electronics, 9(8):1188.

[2]AhmedS, MayoNE, HigginsJ, et al., 2003. The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM): a comparison with other measures used to evaluate effects of stroke and rehabilitation. Phys Ther, 83(7):617-630.

[3]AndrowisGJ, PilkarR, RamanujamA, et al., 2018. Electromyography assessment during gait in a robotic exoskeleton for acute stroke. Front Neurol, 9:630.

[4]AumannS, DonnerS, FischerJ, et al., 2019. Optical coherence tomography (OCT): principle and technical realization. In: Bille JF (Ed.), High Resolution Imaging in Microscopy and Ophthalmology. Springer, Cham, p.59-85.

[5]AuriatAM, NevaJL, PetersS, et al., 2015. A review of transcranial magnetic stimulation and multimodal neuroimaging to characterize post-stroke neuroplasticity. Front Neurol, 6:226.

[6]BaranU, LiYD, WangRK, 2015. In vivo tissue injury mapping using optical coherence tomography based methods. Appl Opt, 54(21):6448-6453.

[7]BarrittAW, SmithardDG, 2009. Role of cerebral cortex plasticity in the recovery of swallowing function following dysphagic stroke. Dysphagia, 24(1):83-90.

[8]BernhardtJ, BorschmannK, BoydL, et al., 2016. Moving rehabilitation research forward: developing consensus statements for rehabilitation and recovery research. Int J Stroke, 11(4):454-458.

[9]BevilacquaDE, MaillardS, FerrariJ, 2019. Measuring joint hypermobility using the Hospital Del Mar criteria—a reliability analysis using secondary data analysis. Arch Rheum Arthritis Res, 1(1):1-6.

[10]BiscettiF, GiovanniniS, StrafaceG, et al., 2016. RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway: genetic association with history of ischemic stroke in Italian population. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 20(21):4574-4580.

[11]BlumL, Korner-BitenskyN, 2008. Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther, 88(5):559-566.

[12]BoseckerC, DipietroL, VolpeB, et al., 2010. Kinematic robot-based evaluation scales and clinical counterparts to measure upper limb motor performance in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 24(1):62-69.

[13]BoydLA, HaywardKS, WardNS, et al., 2017. Biomarkers of stroke recovery: consensus-based core recommendations from the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 31(10-11):864-876.

[14]CaliandroP, MolteniF, SimbolottiC, et al., 2020. Exoskeleton-assisted gait in chronic stroke: an EMG and functional near-infrared spectroscopy study of muscle activation patterns and prefrontal cortex activity. Clin Neurophysiol, 131(8):1775-1781.

[15]CalvertGA, BrammerMJ, MorrisRG, et al., 2000. Using fMRI to study recovery from acquired dysphasia. Brain Lang, 71(3):391-399.

[16]CarnevaleA, LongoUG, SchenaE, et al., 2019. Wearable systems for shoulder kinematics assessment: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 20:546.

[17]ChenJ, SunDL, ShiYH, et al., 2019. Dynamic alterations in spontaneous neural activity in multiple brain networks in subacute stroke patients: a resting-state fMRI study. Front Neurosci, 12:994.

[18]ChoiWJ, ReifR, YousefiS, et al., 2014. Improved microcirculation imaging of human skin in vivo using optical microangiography with a correlation mapping mask. J Biomed Opt, 19(3):036010.

[19]ChoiWJ, LiYD, WangRK, 2019. Monitoring acute stroke progression: multi-parametric OCT imaging of cortical perfusion, flow, and tissue scattering in a mouse model of permanent focal ischemia. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 38(6):1427-1437.

[20]CôtéR, BattistaRN, WolfsonC, et al., 1989. The Canadian Neurological Scale validation and reliability assessment. Neurology, 39(5):638-643.

[21]Dacosta-AguayoR, GrañaM, SavioA, et al., 2014. Prognostic value of changes in resting-state functional connectivity patterns in cognitive recovery after stroke: a 3T fMRI pilot study. Hum Brain Mapp, 35(8):3819-3831.

[22]de CarloTE, RomanoA, WaheedNK, et al., 2015. A review of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Int J Retina Vitreous, 1:5.

[23]DiasN, LiXH, ZhangC, et al., 2018. Innervation asymmetry of the external anal sphincter in aging characterized from high-density intra-rectal surface EMG recordings. Neurourol Urodyn, 37(8):2544-2550.

[24]DiasN, ZhangC, LiXH, et al., 2019. Neural control properties of the external anal sphincter in young and elderly women. Neurourol Urodyn, 38(7):1828-1833.

[25]DiesfeldtHFA, 1983. Verbal fluency tests and their significance for psychogeriatric practice. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr, 14:49-59.

[26]EkinciY, YaşaroğluOF, DügerT, 2021. Content comparison of four commonly used amputee mobility assessment scales in the literature by linking to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Pro‍sthet Orthot Int, 45(6):544-552.

[27]EldaiefMC, DickersonBC, CamprodonJA, 2022. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the neurological patient: scientific principles and applications. Semin Neurol, 42(2):149-157.

[28]EnderbyP, 1980. Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment. Int J Lang Commun Disord, 15(3):165-173.

[29]FengL, ZhouD, LuoC, et al., 2021. Clinically applicable artificial intelligence algorithm for the diagnosis, evaluation, and monitoring of acute retinal necrosis. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol), 22(6):504-511.

[30]FerransCE, PowersMJ, 1985. Quality of life index: development and psychometric properties. Adv Nurs Sci, 8(1):15-24.

[31]FerransCE, PowersMJ, 1992. Psychometric assessment of the quality of life index. Res Nurs Health, 15(1):29-38.

[32]FolsteinMF, RobinsLN, HelzerJE, 1983. The Mini-Mental State Examination. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 40(7):812.

[33]Fugl-MeyerAR, JääsköL, LeymanI, et al., 1975. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med, 7(1):13-31.

[34]GallasS, MoirotP, DebonoG, et al., 2007. Mylohyoid motor-evoked potentials relate to swallowing function after chronic stroke dysphagia. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 19(6):453-458.

[35]GladstoneDJ, DanellsCJ, BlackSE, 2002. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 16(3):232-240.

[36]GoenA, TiwariDC, 2013. Review of surface electromyogram signals: its analysis and applications. World Acad Sci Eng Technol Int J Electr Comput Eng, 7(11):936-943.

[37]GoldsteinLB, BertelsC, DavisJN, 1989. Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale. Arch Neurol, 46(6):660-662.

[38]GolestaniAM, TymchukS, DemchukA, et al., 2013. Longitudinal evaluation of resting-state fMRI after acute stroke with hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 27(2):‍153-163.

[39]GowlandC, StratfordP, WardM, et al., 1993. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke, 24(1):58-63.

[40]GuoQH, SunYM, YuPM, et al., 2007. Norm of auditory verbal learning test in the normal aged in China community. Chin J Clin Psychol, 15(2):132-134, 141 (in Chinese).

[41]GuptaD, BansalP, ChoudharyK, 2018. The state of the art of feature extraction techniques in speech recognition. In: Agrawal SS, Devi A, Wason R, et al. (Eds.), Speech and Language Processing for Human-Machine Communications. Springer, Singapore, p.195-207.

[42]HajekVE, RutmanDL, ScherH, 1989. Brief assessment of cognitive impairment in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 70(2):114-117.

[43]HamzeiF, LiepertJ, DettmersC, et al., 2006. Two different reorganization patterns after rehabilitative therapy: an exploratory study with fMRI and TMS. NeuroImage, 31(2):710-720.

[44]HanJ, WaddingtonG, AdamsR, et al., 2016. Assessing proprioception: a critical review of methods. J Sport Health Sci, 5(1):80-90.

[45]HantsonL, de WeerdtW, de KeyserJ, et al., 1994. The European Stroke Scale. Stroke, 25(11):2215-2219.

[46]HartiganI, 2007. A comparative review of the Katz ADL and the Barthel Index in assessing the activities of daily living of older people. Int J Older People Nurs, 2(3):204-212.

[47]HebertR, CarrierR, BilodeauA, 1988. The Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF): description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps. Age Ageing, 17(5):293-302.

[48]HolbrookM, SkilbeckCE, 1983. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing, 12(2):166-170.

[49]HuXG, SureshAK, RymerWZ, et al., 2015. Assessing altered motor unit recruitment patterns in paretic muscles of stroke survivors using surface electromyography. J Neural Eng, 12(6):066001.

[50]HwangP, SohnMK, KimCS, et al., 2016. Tibial somatosensory evoked potential can prognosticate for ambulatory function in subacute hemiplegic stroke. J Clin Neurosci, 26:122-125.

[51]ImuraT, MitsutakeT, IwamotoY, et al., 2021. A systematic review of the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting the gait ability of stroke patients. Sci Rep, 11:14338.

[52]JangSH, 2011. A review of diffusion tensor imaging studies on motor recovery mechanisms in stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation, 28(4):345-352.

[53]JaraczK, KozubskiW, 2003. Quality of life in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand, 107(5):324-329.

[54]JohanssonBB, 2011. Current trends in stroke rehabilitation. A review with focus on brain plasticity. Acta Neurol Scand, 123(3):147-159.

[55]JoshiCD, LahiriU, ThakorNV, 2013. Classification of gait phases from lower limb EMG: application to exoskeleton orthosis. Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Point-of-Care Healthcare Technologies (PHT), p.228-231.

[56]LACKallenberg, HermensHJ, 2009. Motor unit properties of biceps brachii in chronic stroke patients assessed with high-density surface EMG. Muscle Nerve, 39(2):177-185.

[57]KasnerSE, 2006. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol, 5(7):603-612.

[58]KatzN, ItzkovichM, AverbuchS, et al., 1989. Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) battery for brain-injured patients: reliability and validity. Am J Occup Ther, 43(3):184-192.

[59]KatzS, 1983. Assessing self-maintenance: activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. J Am Geriatr Soc, 31(12):721-727.

[60]KatzS, DownsTD, CashHR, et al., 1970. Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist, 10(1):20-30.

[61]KawamuraCM, de Morais FilhoMC, BarretoMM, et al., 2007. Comparison between visual and three-dimensional gait analysis in patients with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Gait Posture, 25(1):18-24.

[62]KidzińskiŁ, YangB, HicksJL, et al., 2020. Deep neural networks enable quantitative movement analysis using single-camera videos. Nat Commun, 11:4054.

[63]KimB, WinsteinC, 2017. Can neurological biomarkers of brain impairment be used to predict poststroke motor recovery? A systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 31(1):3-24.

[64]KimBJ, KangHG, KimHJ, et al., 2014. Magnetic resonance imaging in acute ischemic stroke treatment. J Stroke, 16(3):131-145.

[65]LawtonMP, BrodyEM, 1969. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist, 9(3):179-186.

[66]LeeMH, SiewiorekDP, SmailagicA, et al., 2020. Opportunities of a machine learning-based decision support system for stroke rehabilitation assessment. arXiv:2002.12261v2.

[67]LiF, AnBC, ZhengJJ, 2015. Evaluating hand neural-muscle function after stroke with surface electromyography (review). Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 21(3):‍280-283 (in Chinese).

[68]LiXY, ShinH, ZhouP, et al., 2014. Power spectral analysis of surface electromyography (EMG) at matched contraction levels of the first dorsal interosseous muscle in stroke survivors. Clin Neurophysiol, 125(5):988-994.

[69]LinacreJM, HeinemannAW, WrightBD, et al., 1994. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 75(2):127-132.

[70]LindenbergR, RengaV, ZhuLL, et al., 2010. Structural integrity of corticospinal motor fibers predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke. Neurology, 74(4):280-287.

[71]LindenstrømE, BoysenG, ChristiansenLW, et al., 1991. Reliability of Scandinavian Neurological Stroke Scale. Cerebrovasc Dis, 1(2):103-107.

[72]LindmarkB, HamrinE, 1988. Evaluation of functional capacity after stroke as a basis for active intervention. Presentation of a modified chart for motor capacity assessment and its reliability. Scand J Rehabil Med, 20(3):103-109.

[73]LioiG, ButetS, FleuryM, et al., 2020. A multi-target motor imagery training using bimodal EEG-fMRI neurofeedback: a pilot study in chronic stroke patients. Front Hum Neurosci, 14:37.

[74]LiuC, ChenS, ZhangH, et al., 2021. Bioinformatic analysis for potential biological processes and key targets of heart failure-related stroke. J Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol), 22(9):718-732.

[75]LiuJ, WangY, ZhaoYQ, et al., 2016. Measurement of cerebral blood flow rate and its relationship with brain function using optical coherence tomography. Proceedings of SPIE 9707, Dynamics and Fluctuations in Biomedical Photonics XIII, p.208-213.

[76]LorenziM, BonassiS, LorenziT, et al., 2018. A review of telomere length in sarcopenia and frailty. Biogerontology, 19(3-4):209-221.

[77]MaCC, LiuAJ, LiZZ, et al., 2014. Longitudinal study of diffusion tensor imaging properties of affected cortical spinal tracts in acute and chronic hemorrhagic stroke. J Clin Neurosci, 21(8):1388-1392.

[78]MaZH, DingN, YuY, et al., 2018. Quantification of cerebral vascular perfusion density via optical coherence tomography based on locally adaptive regional growth. Appl Opt, 57(35):10117-10124.

[79]MarottaN, AmmendoliaA, MarinaroC, et al., 2020. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) and correlation between disability and finance assets in chronic stroke patients. Acta Biomed, 91(3):e2020064.

[80]McDonnellMN, StinearCM, 2017. TMS measures of motor cortex function after stroke: a meta-analysis. Brain Stimul, 10(4):721-734.

[81]MintzopoulosD, AstrakasLG, KhanichehA, et al., 2009. Connectivity alterations assessed by combining fMRI and MR-compatible hand robots in chronic stroke. NeuroImage, 47(Suppl 2):T90-T97.

[82]MouridsenK, ThurnerP, ZaharchukG, 2020. Artificial intelligence applications in stroke. Stroke, 51(8):2573-2579.

[83]NasreddineZS, PhillipsNA, BédirianV, et al., 2005. The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc, 53(4):695-699.

[84]NazmiN, RahmanMAA, YamamotoSI, et al., 2019. Walking gait event detection based on electromyography signals using artificial neural network. Biomed Signal Process Control, 47:334-343.

[85]OhSS, KimY, LeeYB, et al., 2022. Optical modalities for research, diagnosis, and treatment of stroke and the consequent brain injuries. Appl Sci, 12(4):1891.

[86]OsmonDC, SmetIC, WinegardenB, et al., 1992. Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination: its use with unilateral stroke patients in a rehabilitation setting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 73(5):414-418.

[87]Ostrosky-SolísF, LozanoA, 2006. Digit span: effect of education and culture. Int J Psychol, 41(5):333-341.

[88]ParkCH, ChangWH, OhnSH, et al., 2011. Longitudinal changes of resting-state functional connectivity during motor recovery after stroke. Stroke, 42(5):1357-1362.

[89]ParkJS, HwangNK, KimHH, et al., 2019. Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with effortful swallowing using electromyographic biofeedback on oropharyngeal swallowing function in stroke patients with dysphagia: a pilot study. Medicine (Baltimore), 98(44):e17702.

[90]ParkS, FisherAG, VelozoCA, 1994. Using the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills to compare occupational performance between clinic and home settings. Am J Occup Ther, 48(8):697-709.

[91]ParsonsMW, ChristensenS, McElduffP, et al., 2010. Pretreatment diffusion- and perfusion-MR lesion volumes have a crucial influence on clinical response to stroke thrombolysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 30(6):‍1214-1225.

[92]PellicciariMC, BonnìS, PonzoV, et al., 2018. Dynamic reorganization of TMS-evoked activity in subcortical stroke patients. Neuroimage, 175:365-378.

[93]PfefferRI, KurosakiTT, HarrahCH, et al., 1982. Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. J Gerontol, 37(3):323-329.

[94]PlatzT, EickhofC, NuyensG, et al., 2005. Clinical scales for the assessment of spasticity, associated phenomena, and function: a systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil, 27(1-2):7-18.

[95]QiR, 2005. Introduction of common stroke efficacy evaluation methods. Chin Acupunct Maribustion, 25(4):‍263-264 (in Chinese).

[96]ReitanRM, 1955. Investigation of the validity of Halstead’s measures of biological intelligence. AMA Arch Neurol Psych, 73(1):28-35.

[97]RosaMCN, MarquesA, DemainS, et al., 2014. Lower limb co-contraction during walking in subjects with stroke: a systematic review. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 24(1):1-10.

[98]RoyallDR, CordesJA, PolkM, 1998. CLOX: an executive clock drawing task. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych, 64(5):588-594.

[99]RozanskiGM, HuntleyAH, CrosbyLD, et al., 2020. Lower limb muscle activity underlying temporal gait asymmetry post-stroke. Clin Neurophysiol, 131(8):1848-1858.

[100]RudrapatnaSU, WielochT, BeirupK, et al., 2014. Can diffusion kurtosis imaging improve the sensitivity and specificity of detecting microstructural alterations in brain tissue chronically after experimental stroke? Comparisons with diffusion tensor imaging and histology. NeuroImage, 97:363-373.

[101]SackAT, DEJLinden, 2003. Combining transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional imaging in cognitive brain research: possibilities and limitations. Brain Res Rev, 43(1):41-56.

[102]ScanoA, ZanolettiM, PirovanoI, et al., 2019. NIRS-EMG for clinical applications: a systematic review. Appl Sci, 9(15):2952.

[103]ScarpinaF, TaginiS, 2017. The Stroop Color and Word Test. Front Psychol, 8:557.

[104]SchlagerA, AhlqvistK, Rasmussen-BarrE, et al., 2018. Inter- and intra-rater reliability for measurement of range of motion in joints included in three hypermobility assessment methods. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 19:376.

[105]SchwarzA, KanzlerCM, LambercyO, et al., 2019. Systematic review on kinematic assessments of upper limb movements after stroke. Stroke, 50(3):718-727.

[106]ShahS, VanclayF, CooperB, 1989. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol, 42(8):703-709.

[107]ShahSK, 1984. Reliability of the original Brunnstrom recovery scale following hemiplegia. Aust Occup Ther J, 31(4):144-151.

[108]SrinivasanVJ, RadhakrishnanH, JiangJY, et al., 2012. Op

[109]tical coherence microscopy for deep tissue imaging of the cerebral cortex with intrinsic contrast. Opt Express, 20(3):2220-2239.

[110]SteinbergN, AdamsR, AyalonM, et al., 2019. Recent ankle injury, sport participation level, and tests of proprioception. J Sport Rehabil, 28(8):824-830.

[111]StinearCM, BarberPA, PetoeM, et al., 2012. The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. Brain, 135(Pt 8):2527-2535.

[112]StinearCM, LangCE, ZeilerS, et al., 2020. Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol, 19(4):348-360.

[113]SulterG, SteenC, de KeyserJ, 1999. Use of the Barthel Index and Modified Rankin Scale in acute stroke trials. Stroke, 30(8):1538-1541.

[114]TakaraK, 1971. Two-point discrimination on various type of skin graft to hand and foot. Kumamoto Igakkai Zasshi, 45(1):94-121.

[115]TaoWJ, LiuT, ZhengRC, et al., 2012. Gait analysis using wearable sensors. Sensors (Basel), 12(2):2255-2283.

[116]TopolEJ, 2019. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med, 25(1):44-56.

[117]TsaoCW, AdayAW, AlmarzooqZI, et al., 2022. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2022 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 145(8):‍e153-e639.

[118]van DokkumL, HauretI, MottetD, et al., 2014. The contribution of kinematics in the assessment of upper limb motor recovery early after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 28(1):4-12.

[119]VeerbeekJM, KwakkelG, van WegenEEH, et al., 2011. Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review. Stroke, 42(5):1482-1488.

[120]VermeerKA, MoJ, WedaJJA, et al., 2014. Depth-resolved model-based reconstruction of attenuation coefficients in optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express, 5(1):322-337.

[121]VinstrupJ, CalatayudJ, JakobsenMD, et al., 2018. Hand strengthening exercises in chronic stroke patients: dose-response evaluation using electromyography. J Hand Ther, 31(1):111-121.

[122]WaddingtonG, AdamsR, HanJ, et al., 2014. A new method for measuring dynamic proprioception. J Sci Med Sport, 18(Suppl 1):e141.

[123]WangC, MengB, ChenJP, 2019. Applicability of Boston naming test for assessment of postoperative language dysfunction. Zhejiang Med, 41(16):1742-1745 (in Chinese).

[124]WangH, MagnainC, SakadžićS, et al., 2017. Characterizing the optical properties of human brain tissue with high numerical aperture optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express, 8(12):5617-5636.

[125]WangP, WangHX, 2016. Advance in neuro-electrophysiological techniques in functional evaluation after stroke (review). Chin J Rehabil Theory, 22(12):1404-1407 (in Chinese).

[126]WangRK, AnL, 2009. Doppler optical micro-angiography for volumetric imaging of vascular perfusion in vivo. Opt Express, 17(11):8926-8940.

[127]WangTL, MantiniD, GillebertCR, 2018. The potential of real-time fMRI neurofeedback for stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Cortex, 107:148-165.

[128]WareJE, SherbourneCD, 1992. The MOS 36-ltem short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care, 30(6):473-483.

[129]WeiPN, ZhangJH, WeiPP, et al., 2020. Different sEMG and EEG features analysis for gait phase recognition. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society, p.1002-1006.

[130]WeinsteinS, 1993. Fifty years of somatosensory research. J Hand Ther, 6(1):11-22.

[131]WHO (World Health Organization), 2001. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organization, Geneva.

[132]WilliamsLS, WeinbergerM, HarrisLE, et al., 1999. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke, 30(7):1362-1369.

[133]YamadaK, SakaiK, AkazawaK, et al., 2013. Detection of early neuronal damage in CADASIL patients by q-space MR imaging. Neuroradiology, 55(3):283-290.

[134]YangSS, LiuKZ, DingHJ, et al., 2019. Longitudinal in vivo intrinsic optical imaging of cortical blood perfusion and tissue damage in focal photothrombosis stroke model. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 39(7):1381-1393.

[135]YooAJ, BarakER, CopenWA, et al., 2010. Combining acute diffusion-weighted imaging and mean transmit time lesion volumes with national institutes of health stroke scale score improves the prediction of acute stroke outcome. Stroke, 41(8):1728-1735.

[136]YoonHS, YouJSH, 2017. Reflex-mediated dynamic neuromuscular stabilization in stroke patients: EMG processing and ultrasound imaging. Technol Health Care, 25(S1):99-106.

[137]ZhaoQH, GuoQH, LiF, et al., 2013. The Shape Trail Test: application of a new variant of the trail making test. PLoS ONE, 8(2):e57333.

[138]ZhengJJ, HuYH, YuZW, 2007. Application of surface electromyography in the estimate of neural-muscle function (review). Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract, 13(8):‍741-742 (in Chinese).

[139]ZhouN, 2002. A new approach to stroke assessment: SIAS. Foreign Med Sci (Sec Phys Med Relakieitation), 22(1):1-4 (in Chinese).